issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 278743801 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- open_dataarray docs still contains *args, **kwargs · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
349175571 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-349175571 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE3NTU3MQ== | raybellwaves 17162724 | 2017-12-05T02:31:56Z | 2017-12-07T03:23:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @jhamman it was just a quick comparison with the docs online see http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.open_dataset.html vs http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.open_dataarray.html The stickler in me wants to ensure the docs are the same for both functions (i.e. list the inputs are the same) between |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
open_dataarray docs still contains *args, **kwargs 278743801 | |
349177419 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-349177419 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE3NzQxOQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-12-05T02:44:02Z | 2017-12-05T02:44:02Z | MEMBER | I think this is a documentation issue. From the user side, it would be easier to understand if the arguments of this function are explicitly listed; auto-completion or function help in Ipython would also work. But from the developer side, the explicit arguments will increase the risk of bugs. Personally, I prefer the explicit function arguments, but I will not oppose the decision by the group. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
open_dataarray docs still contains *args, **kwargs 278743801 | |
349106003 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-349106003 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTEwNjAwMw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-12-04T21:08:29Z | 2017-12-04T21:08:29Z | MEMBER | @raybellwaves - can you explain what specific problem the current |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
open_dataarray docs still contains *args, **kwargs 278743801 | |
348744269 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-348744269 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0ODc0NDI2OQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-12-03T06:42:24Z | 2017-12-03T06:42:24Z | MEMBER | Hi, raybellwaves, I think |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
open_dataarray docs still contains *args, **kwargs 278743801 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3