issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 275744315 and user = 1197350 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- IndexError when printing dataset from an Argo file · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 346120371 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1732#issuecomment-346120371 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1732 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NjEyMDM3MQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-11-21T18:36:49Z | 2017-11-21T18:36:49Z | MEMBER |
Rather than drop a variable the user could read with no problem under xarray 0.9.6, I propose we examine our new indexing wrappers and figure out how to fix this bug. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
IndexError when printing dataset from an Argo file 275744315 | |
| 346072873 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1732#issuecomment-346072873 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1732 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NjA3Mjg3Mw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-11-21T16:00:58Z | 2017-11-21T16:00:58Z | MEMBER | ~It's good to see that the release-candidate process actually works!~ 😭 |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 1,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
IndexError when printing dataset from an Argo file 275744315 | |
| 346059225 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1732#issuecomment-346059225 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1732 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NjA1OTIyNQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-11-21T15:20:21Z | 2017-11-21T15:20:21Z | MEMBER | It's good to see that the release-candidate process actually works! 😉 |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
IndexError when printing dataset from an Argo file 275744315 | |
| 346056557 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1732#issuecomment-346056557 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1732 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NjA1NjU1Nw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-11-21T15:12:28Z | 2017-11-21T15:12:38Z | MEMBER | Guillaume--this is very troubling! I use xarray frequently on ARGO netCDF files. It would be a shame if we broke something related to reading them. It sounds like this could be related to the indexing changes in #1676. Since rc1, xarray 0.10.0 has gone through another release candidate (rc2) and is now in full release. Can you try upgrading to the just-released 0.10.0 and verify whether the problem is still present? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
IndexError when printing dataset from an Argo file 275744315 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1