issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 274233261 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- colorbars in facet grids · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 345795013 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1717#issuecomment-345795013 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1717 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTc5NTAxMw== | JoyMonteiro 7300413 | 2017-11-20T19:04:11Z | 2017-11-20T19:04:11Z | NONE | Great, will prepare a PR! I second @fmaussion on keeping the auto colorbar, just makes life easy! |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
colorbars in facet grids 274233261 | |
| 345770964 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1717#issuecomment-345770964 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1717 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTc3MDk2NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-20T17:39:07Z | 2017-11-20T17:39:07Z | MEMBER | I was thinking for everything. But I'm OK deferring to your judgment on this one :) On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:26 AM Fabien Maussion notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
colorbars in facet grids 274233261 | |
| 345767423 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1717#issuecomment-345767423 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1717 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTc2NzQyMw== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-11-20T17:26:46Z | 2017-11-20T17:26:46Z | MEMBER |
For all 2D plots or just for facetgrids? In general I like the all-in-one feeling of xarray plots currently, and I imagine that the automatic colorbar is used very often. |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
colorbars in facet grids 274233261 | |
| 345765551 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1717#issuecomment-345765551 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1717 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTc2NTU1MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-20T17:20:36Z | 2017-11-20T17:20:36Z | MEMBER | Indeed, for consistency it would make sense to add |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
colorbars in facet grids 274233261 | |
| 345761849 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1717#issuecomment-345761849 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1717 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTc2MTg0OQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-11-20T17:07:42Z | 2017-11-20T17:07:42Z | MEMBER | What are the arguments against |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
colorbars in facet grids 274233261 | |
| 345752241 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1717#issuecomment-345752241 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1717 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTc1MjI0MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-11-20T16:37:20Z | 2017-11-20T16:37:20Z | MEMBER | I don't think we have anything like this in the development version yet. I wonder if it would be better to stop plotting colorbars automatically, and instead require explicitly calling |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
colorbars in facet grids 274233261 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3