issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 262642978 and user = 703554 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
444187219 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-444187219 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NDE4NzIxOQ== | alimanfoo 703554 | 2018-12-04T17:33:34Z | 2018-12-04T17:33:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
392831984 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-392831984 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MjgzMTk4NA== | alimanfoo 703554 | 2018-05-29T15:59:46Z | 2018-05-29T15:59:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok, cool. Was wondering if now was right time to revisit that, alongside the work proposed in this PR. Happy to participate in that discussion, still interested in implementing some alternative index classes. On Tue, 29 May 2018, 15:45 Stephan Hoyer, notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
392692996 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-392692996 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MjY5Mjk5Ng== | alimanfoo 703554 | 2018-05-29T08:20:22Z | 2018-05-29T08:20:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I see this mentions an Index API, is that still to be decided? On Tue, 29 May 2018, 05:28 Stephan Hoyer, notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
338622746 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-338622746 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzODYyMjc0Ng== | alimanfoo 703554 | 2017-10-23T10:56:40Z | 2017-10-23T10:56:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Just to say I'm interested in how MultiIndexes are handled also. In our use case, we have two variables conventionally named CHROM (chromosome) and POS (position) which together describe a location in a genome. I want to combine both variables into a multi-index so I can, e.g., select all data from some data variable for chromosome X between positions 100,000-200,000. For all our data variables, this genome location multi-index would be used to index the first dimension. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1