issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 262642978 and user = 6815844 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 442809859 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-442809859 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjgwOTg1OQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-11-29T12:05:03Z | 2018-11-29T12:05:03Z | MEMBER | I am late for the party (but still only have time to write a short comment). I am a big fan of MultiIndex and like @shoyer 's idea.
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
| 379920389 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-379920389 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3OTkyMDM4OQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-04-09T23:03:03Z | 2018-04-09T23:04:01Z | MEMBER | @shoyer, thank you for detailing. I am thinking how can we establish the following Or, we may give up to restore the original coordinate structure during the above action, but stil keep them as ordinary coodinates. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
| 336381864 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-336381864 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNjM4MTg2NA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-13T08:09:25Z | 2017-10-13T08:09:25Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the details. (Sorry for my late responce. It took a long for me to understand what does it look like.) I am wondering what the advantageous cases which are realized with this
Are they correct?
That sounds reasonable.
I like the latter one, as it is easier to understand even for non-pandas users. What does the actual implementation look like?
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
| 334125888 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-334125888 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDEyNTg4OA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-04T11:25:14Z | 2017-10-04T12:43:59Z | MEMBER | @shoyer, could you add more details of this idea?
I think I do not yet fully understand the practical difference between
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
| 334043044 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-334043044 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDA0MzA0NA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-04T03:51:57Z | 2017-10-04T03:51:57Z | MEMBER | I think we currently assume It sounds a much cleaner data model. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
| 334029215 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-334029215 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDAyOTIxNQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-04T01:55:02Z | 2017-10-04T01:55:02Z | MEMBER | I'm using Consider the following example, ```python In [1]: import numpy as np ...: import xarray as xr ...: da = xr.DataArray(np.arange(5), dims=['x'], ...: coords={'experiment': ('x', [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]), ...: 'time': ('x', [0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.0, 0.15])}) ...: In [2]: da Out[2]: <xarray.DataArray (x: 5)> array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4]) Coordinates: experiment (x) int64 0 0 0 1 1 time (x) float64 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.15 Dimensions without coordinates: x ``` I want to do something like this
If we could make a selection from a non-index coordinate,
I think there should be other important usecases of |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1