issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 262642978 and user = 6815844 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
442809859 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-442809859 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjgwOTg1OQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-11-29T12:05:03Z | 2018-11-29T12:05:03Z | MEMBER | I am late for the party (but still only have time to write a short comment). I am a big fan of MultiIndex and like @shoyer 's idea.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
379920389 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-379920389 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3OTkyMDM4OQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-04-09T23:03:03Z | 2018-04-09T23:04:01Z | MEMBER | @shoyer, thank you for detailing. I am thinking how can we establish the following Or, we may give up to restore the original coordinate structure during the above action, but stil keep them as ordinary coodinates. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
336381864 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-336381864 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNjM4MTg2NA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-13T08:09:25Z | 2017-10-13T08:09:25Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the details. (Sorry for my late responce. It took a long for me to understand what does it look like.) I am wondering what the advantageous cases which are realized with this
Are they correct?
That sounds reasonable.
I like the latter one, as it is easier to understand even for non-pandas users. What does the actual implementation look like?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
334125888 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-334125888 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDEyNTg4OA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-04T11:25:14Z | 2017-10-04T12:43:59Z | MEMBER | @shoyer, could you add more details of this idea?
I think I do not yet fully understand the practical difference between
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
334043044 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-334043044 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDA0MzA0NA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-04T03:51:57Z | 2017-10-04T03:51:57Z | MEMBER | I think we currently assume It sounds a much cleaner data model. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 | |
334029215 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-334029215 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzNDAyOTIxNQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-10-04T01:55:02Z | 2017-10-04T01:55:02Z | MEMBER | I'm using Consider the following example, ```python In [1]: import numpy as np ...: import xarray as xr ...: da = xr.DataArray(np.arange(5), dims=['x'], ...: coords={'experiment': ('x', [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]), ...: 'time': ('x', [0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.0, 0.15])}) ...: In [2]: da Out[2]: <xarray.DataArray (x: 5)> array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4]) Coordinates: experiment (x) int64 0 0 0 1 1 time (x) float64 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.15 Dimensions without coordinates: x ``` I want to do something like this
If we could make a selection from a non-index coordinate,
I think there should be other important usecases of |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Explicit indexes in xarray's data-model (Future of MultiIndex) 262642978 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1