issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 243964948 and user = 4992424 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Support for jagged array · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
316376598 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1482#issuecomment-316376598 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1482 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNjM3NjU5OA== | darothen 4992424 | 2017-07-19T12:54:30Z | 2017-07-19T12:54:30Z | NONE | @mitar it depends on your data/application, right? But that information would also be helpful in figuring out alternative pathways. If you're always going to process the images individually or sequentially, then what advantage is there (aside from convenience) of dumping them in some giant array with forced dimensions/shape per slice? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for jagged array 243964948 | |
316371416 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1482#issuecomment-316371416 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1482 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNjM3MTQxNg== | darothen 4992424 | 2017-07-19T12:34:32Z | 2017-07-19T12:34:32Z | NONE | The problem is that these sorts of arrays break the common data model on top of which xarray (and NetCDF) is built.
Yes, if you can pre-process all the images and align them on some common set of dimensions (maybe just xi and yi, denoting integer index in the x and y directions), and pad unused space for each image with NaNs, then you could concatenate everything into a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for jagged array 243964948 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1