issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 238990919 and user = 10050469 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
issue 1
- CF conventions for time doesn't support years · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
319325871 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1467#issuecomment-319325871 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1467 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxOTMyNTg3MQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-08-01T09:57:42Z | 2017-08-02T16:05:15Z | MEMBER | Hi Matthias, I think your solution is fine. The best is simply to avoid "months" as units altogether. If one has a "real" calendar one can also let pandas and xarray do the job:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF conventions for time doesn't support years 238990919 | |
311634421 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1467#issuecomment-311634421 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1467 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxMTYzNDQyMQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-06-28T11:36:37Z | 2017-06-28T11:36:37Z | MEMBER |
Can you pinpoint to which part of the CF convention? From the link I read: I agree however that interpreting "years" as being "calendar years" is the only way that makes sense. For the record, netCDF4 also doesn't like "years": ```python import netCDF4 ds = netCDF4.Dataset('/home/mowglie/Downloads/histsoc_population_0.5deg_1861-2005.nc4') time = ds.variables['time'] netCDF4.num2date(time[:], units=time.units) ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-15-b38f64c7bce4> in <module>() 2 ds = netCDF4.Dataset('histsoc_population_0.5deg_1861-2005.nc4') 3 time = ds.variables['time'] ----> 4 netCDF4.num2date(time[:], units=time.units) netCDF4/_netCDF4.pyx in netCDF4._netCDF4.num2date (netCDF4/_netCDF4.c:66463)() ValueError: unsupported time units ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF conventions for time doesn't support years 238990919 | |
311620076 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1467#issuecomment-311620076 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1467 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxMTYyMDA3Ng== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-06-28T10:24:36Z | 2017-06-28T10:24:36Z | MEMBER | I am not sure to understand what you are asking us to do here. The problem with "years" is that their use is not recommended by the CF conventions. Very often (and I think your file means it this way), users would like years to be simple "calendar years" , i.e. : 1901-01-01, 1902-01-01, but this is not what the unit "years" means in the CF conventions: see http://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/v1.6.0/cf-conventions.html#time-coordinate |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF conventions for time doesn't support years 238990919 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1