issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 231061878 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Huge memory use when using FacetGrid · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
497154447 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1424#issuecomment-497154447 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1424 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NzE1NDQ0Nw== | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2019-05-30T00:20:13Z | 2019-05-30T00:20:13Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Huge memory use when using FacetGrid 231061878 | |
303857073 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1424#issuecomment-303857073 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1424 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMzg1NzA3Mw== | mangecoeur 743508 | 2017-05-24T21:28:44Z | 2017-05-24T21:28:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Dataset isn't chunked, and yes I am using cartopy to draw coastlines following the example in the docs:
where |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Huge memory use when using FacetGrid 231061878 | |
303856113 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1424#issuecomment-303856113 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1424 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMzg1NjExMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-24T21:24:35Z | 2017-05-24T21:24:35Z | MEMBER | You're using cartopy? If you're plotting a basemap of some sort, that might make a large difference in the memory usage. A full code example would certainly be heplful here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Huge memory use when using FacetGrid 231061878 | |
303751420 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1424#issuecomment-303751420 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1424 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMzc1MTQyMA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-24T15:00:52Z | 2017-05-24T15:00:52Z | MEMBER | Is your xarray dataset chunked? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Huge memory use when using FacetGrid 231061878 | |
303748239 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1424#issuecomment-303748239 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1424 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMzc0ODIzOQ== | mangecoeur 743508 | 2017-05-24T14:51:06Z | 2017-05-24T14:51:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 16 maps, although like you say, I'm not sure if this is coming from xarray or matplotlib |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Huge memory use when using FacetGrid 231061878 | |
303747874 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1424#issuecomment-303747874 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1424 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMzc0Nzg3NA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-05-24T14:49:57Z | 2017-05-24T14:49:57Z | MEMBER | How many maps? I don't think that xarray can do much about this problem though... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Huge memory use when using FacetGrid 231061878 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5