issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 225734529 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
453858625 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-453858625 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1Mzg1ODYyNQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-13T19:35:10Z | 2019-01-13T19:35:10Z | MEMBER | Closing this old issue. I'm assuming this behavior no longer exists following the backend refactors in 2018. @rabernat (or others) please reopen if you feel there is more to do here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298737596 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298737596 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNzU5Ng== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T19:33:38Z | 2017-05-02T19:33:51Z | MEMBER | I think that there is an underlying problem with the way that I do notice that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298735693 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298735693 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNTY5Mw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T19:25:59Z | 2017-05-02T19:25:59Z | MEMBER | netCDF4. decode_cf doesn't seem to affect anything important. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298735223 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298735223 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNTIyMw== | pwolfram 4295853 | 2017-05-02T19:24:07Z | 2017-05-02T19:24:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Note, we don't use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298735070 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298735070 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNTA3MA== | pwolfram 4295853 | 2017-05-02T19:23:30Z | 2017-05-02T19:23:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @rabernat, I would say that this is a bug. Is this with the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298692920 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298692920 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY5MjkyMA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T16:48:32Z | 2017-05-02T16:48:32Z | MEMBER | The idea of a fuller test suite is a good idea. One problem is that many of these applications involve really big datasets, so it is hard to share examples. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298688491 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298688491 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY4ODQ5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-02T16:32:07Z | 2017-05-02T16:32:07Z | MEMBER |
OK, so that shouldn't be a problem. Hmm. My only suggestion is that we should think about trying to write a fuller test suite for the auto-close functionality, using a mock or fake of some sort that we can interrogate to verify it works properly. One simple thing would be to refactor the autoclose functionality into a single separate adaptor datastore (which wraps an underlying datastore) that we can more easily test, rather than putting it onto each of the underlying datastore classes. I'm not sure why I didn't think of that when @pwolfram was writing this before. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298683384 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298683384 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY4MzM4NA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T16:13:56Z | 2017-05-02T16:13:56Z | MEMBER | 0.9.3 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
298681206 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298681206 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY4MTIwNg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-02T16:06:18Z | 2017-05-02T16:06:18Z | MEMBER | Just to make sure, which version of xarray are you using? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4