issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 225734529 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work · 9 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 453858625 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-453858625 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1Mzg1ODYyNQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-13T19:35:10Z | 2019-01-13T19:35:10Z | MEMBER | Closing this old issue. I'm assuming this behavior no longer exists following the backend refactors in 2018. @rabernat (or others) please reopen if you feel there is more to do here. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298737596 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298737596 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNzU5Ng== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T19:33:38Z | 2017-05-02T19:33:51Z | MEMBER | I think that there is an underlying problem with the way that I do notice that |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298735693 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298735693 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNTY5Mw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T19:25:59Z | 2017-05-02T19:25:59Z | MEMBER | netCDF4. decode_cf doesn't seem to affect anything important. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298735223 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298735223 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNTIyMw== | pwolfram 4295853 | 2017-05-02T19:24:07Z | 2017-05-02T19:24:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Note, we don't use |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298735070 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298735070 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODczNTA3MA== | pwolfram 4295853 | 2017-05-02T19:23:30Z | 2017-05-02T19:23:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @rabernat, I would say that this is a bug. Is this with the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298692920 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298692920 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY5MjkyMA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T16:48:32Z | 2017-05-02T16:48:32Z | MEMBER | The idea of a fuller test suite is a good idea. One problem is that many of these applications involve really big datasets, so it is hard to share examples. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298688491 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298688491 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY4ODQ5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-02T16:32:07Z | 2017-05-02T16:32:07Z | MEMBER |
OK, so that shouldn't be a problem. Hmm. My only suggestion is that we should think about trying to write a fuller test suite for the auto-close functionality, using a mock or fake of some sort that we can interrogate to verify it works properly. One simple thing would be to refactor the autoclose functionality into a single separate adaptor datastore (which wraps an underlying datastore) that we can more easily test, rather than putting it onto each of the underlying datastore classes. I'm not sure why I didn't think of that when @pwolfram was writing this before. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298683384 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298683384 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY4MzM4NA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2017-05-02T16:13:56Z | 2017-05-02T16:13:56Z | MEMBER | 0.9.3 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 | |
| 298681206 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1394#issuecomment-298681206 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1394 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5ODY4MTIwNg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-05-02T16:06:18Z | 2017-05-02T16:06:18Z | MEMBER | Just to make sure, which version of xarray are you using? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
autoclose with distributed doesn't seem to work 225734529 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4