issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 221366244 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Weighted quantile · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
475055360 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-475055360 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3NTA1NTM2MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-03-20T22:34:22Z | 2019-03-20T22:34:22Z | MEMBER | NumPy does have a pretty bad review back-log :( On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:01 AM chunweiyuan notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
473387146 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-473387146 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MzM4NzE0Ng== | chunweiyuan 5572303 | 2019-03-15T18:01:31Z | 2019-03-15T18:01:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | My personal hope is to keep this thread open just for the record. But given the non-activity on the numpy end, I honestly can't promise any resolution to this issue in the near future. Thanks! PS I persist because some people do seem to appreciate that PR and have forked it for their own use :) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
473082490 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-473082490 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MzA4MjQ5MA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-03-14T22:02:03Z | 2019-03-14T22:02:03Z | MEMBER | Would you like to leave this open @chunweiyuan ? That's quite a thread! I'm impressed by your persistence |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
473033854 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-473033854 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MzAzMzg1NA== | chunweiyuan 5572303 | 2019-03-14T19:52:33Z | 2019-03-14T19:52:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So, as per suggestion by Stephan, I submitted the PR to numpy instead: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/9211 Despite having possibly the highest number of comments of all active numpy PRs and passing all the tests, it's been sitting in limbo for the last few months. There seems to be quite some uncertainty about what to do with it, and the discussion has gone off tangent a bit to more upstream issues. My hope is still to have it eventually merged into numpy, so that it could be easily ported to xarray. It's proven to be quite useful to my coworkers, as well as some of the numpy users. I believe it'll also serve xarray well. Thank you all for your patience. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
472666131 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-472666131 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjY2NjEzMQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-03-14T01:14:43Z | 2019-03-14T01:14:43Z | MEMBER | We could also add things like this to a cookbook section in the docs |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
472640831 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-472640831 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjY0MDgzMQ== | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2019-03-13T23:06:58Z | 2019-03-13T23:06:58Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
293730368 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-293730368 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MzczMDM2OA== | chunweiyuan 5572303 | 2017-04-12T22:56:42Z | 2017-04-12T22:56:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Cool, let me toss it out on the numpy board and see what they think. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 | |
293726771 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-293726771 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MzcyNjc3MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-04-12T22:35:48Z | 2017-04-12T22:35:48Z | MEMBER | I'm sure this is useful, but we try to avoid putting new numeric methods in xarray itself. Would the underlying weighted quantile method (on NumPy arrays) be appropriate for numpy or scipy? Then we might consider adding a wrapper function in xarray (though again, we have to be cautious to avoid overloading xarray with too many methods). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Weighted quantile 221366244 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5