issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 209523348 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- update_attrs method · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 282155745 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-282155745 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MjE1NTc0NQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2017-02-23T23:29:28Z | 2017-02-23T23:29:28Z | MEMBER |
Right, yes. Then there's no reasonable solution without this addition, I think |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
update_attrs method 209523348 | |
| 282146064 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-282146064 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MjE0NjA2NA== | hsharrison 4441865 | 2017-02-23T22:43:10Z | 2017-02-23T22:43:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | FWIW I've been doing
which, yeah, is not too painful. But when I find myself using it every time I use xarray it makes me wish it was included. A lambda solution is more difficult (maybe impossible?) because you need to update the attrs and return the original object to continue the pipe. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
update_attrs method 209523348 | |
| 282123529 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-282123529 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MjEyMzUyOQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2017-02-23T21:15:53Z | 2017-02-23T21:15:53Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the PR @hsharrison Do ppl think the cost of an extra method is worth the cleaner syntax? Would If python had a cleaner lambda... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
update_attrs method 209523348 | |
| 281908185 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-281908185 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MTkwODE4NQ== | hsharrison 4441865 | 2017-02-23T06:36:18Z | 2017-02-23T06:36:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for the tip. I'll give it a shot. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
update_attrs method 209523348 | |
| 281881318 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-281881318 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MTg4MTMxOA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-02-23T03:15:18Z | 2017-02-23T03:15:18Z | MEMBER |
The standard thing to do would be to do a shallow copy of the original object (which copies everything except array data) and then update I like this idea, though I would call it I encourage you to get started on a pull request!
I don't think there's any way to do this currently without a loop. I would say we're open to proposals, which you should probably open another issue to discuss :). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
update_attrs method 209523348 | |
| 281774695 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-281774695 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MTc3NDY5NQ== | cwerner 13906519 | 2017-02-22T19:27:03Z | 2017-02-22T19:27:03Z | NONE | I would like something like this as well! Also, specifying default attrs for all data arrays of a dataset (like missing_data/ _FillValue/ ...) would be nice... Not sure if this is currently possible? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
update_attrs method 209523348 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4