issue_comments
14 rows where issue = 200908727 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck · 14 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
275956940 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275956940 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTk1Njk0MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-29T23:56:04Z | 2017-01-29T23:56:04Z | MEMBER | I added a PR in order to allow a dev version of bottleneck to be used, too: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1235 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275955436 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275955436 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTk1NTQzNg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-29T23:31:29Z | 2017-01-29T23:31:29Z | MEMBER | @fmaussion thanks for puzzling this one out! @ghisvail thanks for the report! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275955256 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275955256 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTk1NTI1Ng== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-29T23:28:18Z | 2017-01-29T23:28:18Z | MEMBER | the tests now pass with bottleneck master. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275910605 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275910605 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTkxMDYwNQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-29T12:26:03Z | 2017-01-29T12:26:03Z | MEMBER | @shoyer nevermind, I found the bug: https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/issues/161 Quite a tricky one indeed ;-) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275909069 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275909069 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTkwOTA2OQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-29T11:53:27Z | 2017-01-29T11:53:27Z | MEMBER | @shoyer there is something very weird going on. See the following example: ```python import numpy as np import bottleneck as bn import xarray as xr da = xr.DataArray(np.ones((10, 20)).astype(np.int), dims=['x', 'y'],
coords={'abc':('y', np.array(['a'] * 9 + ['c'] + ['b'] * 10))})
np.testing.assert_allclose(np.sum(da[:, 9:10]), bn.nansum(da[:, 9:10])) # this will allways work
np.testing.assert_allclose(da.groupby('abc').reduce(np.sum), da.groupby('abc').sum()) # this won't
```AssertionError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-95-d34b19396eb5> in <module>() 2 coords={'abc':('y', np.array(['a'] * 9 + ['c'] + ['b'] * 10))}) 3 np.testing.assert_allclose(np.sum(da[:, 9:10]), bn.nansum(da[:, 9:10])) ----> 4 np.testing.assert_allclose(da.groupby('abc').reduce(np.sum), da.groupby('abc').sum()) /home/mowglie/.pyvirtualenvs/py3/lib/python3.4/site-packages/numpy/testing/utils.py in assert_allclose(actual, desired, rtol, atol, equal_nan, err_msg, verbose) 1409 header = 'Not equal to tolerance rtol=%g, atol=%g' % (rtol, atol) 1410 assert_array_compare(compare, actual, desired, err_msg=str(err_msg), -> 1411 verbose=verbose, header=header, equal_nan=equal_nan) 1412 1413 /home/mowglie/.pyvirtualenvs/py3/lib/python3.4/site-packages/numpy/testing/utils.py in assert_array_compare(comparison, x, y, err_msg, verbose, header, precision, equal_nan) 794 names=('x', 'y'), precision=precision) 795 if not cond: --> 796 raise AssertionError(msg) 797 except ValueError: 798 import traceback AssertionError: Not equal to tolerance rtol=1e-07, atol=0 (mismatch 33.33333333333333%) x: array([ 90., 100., 10.]) y: array([ 90., 100., 1.]) ``` So the new operation is applied only to the first element of the grouped selection, and I didn't manage to us bottleneck only to replicate this (since the first assertion always passes). Before I dig into this I'd like to have your opinion on this: any idea on what could go wrong here? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275448697 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275448697 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTQ0ODY5Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-26T17:14:26Z | 2017-01-26T17:14:26Z | MEMBER | @ghisvail Thanks for your diligence on this. @fmaussion If you can turn one of these into a test case for bottleneck to report upstream that would be super helpful. I would probably start with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275396760 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275396760 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTM5Njc2MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-26T14:10:48Z | 2017-01-26T14:10:48Z | MEMBER | I can confirm that - I have the same problems on my pip virtualenv on linux mint (I tried to reproduce it on travis without success) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
275392455 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-275392455 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NTM5MjQ1NQ== | ghisvail 1964655 | 2017-01-26T13:51:15Z | 2017-01-26T13:51:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Re-opening. Debian now has a version of Numpy with the fix which broke self = <xarray.tests.test_dataarray.TestDataArray testMethod=test_groupby_apply_center>
xarray/tests/test_dataarray.py:1495: xarray/tests/init.py:169: in assertDataArrayAllClose assert_allclose(ar1, ar2, rtol=rtol, atol=atol) xarray/testing.py:125: in assert_allclose assert_allclose(a.variable, b.variable) a = <xarray.Variable (x: 10, y: 20)> array([[ 1.086411e-01, -4.940766e-01, -3.4...e-01, 3.025169e-01, -4.970776e-03, -2.526321e-02, 4.464467e-01]]) b = <xarray.Variable (x: 10, y: 20)> array([[ 1.086411e-01, -4.940766e-01, -3.4...e-01, 3.025169e-01, -4.970776e-03, -2.526321e-02, 4.464467e-01]]) rtol = 1e-05, atol = 1e-08, decode_bytes = True
xarray/testing.py:123: AssertionError _____ TestDataArray.test_groupby_math ______ self = <xarray.tests.test_dataarray.TestDataArray testMethod=test_groupby_math>
xarray/tests/test_dataarray.py:1541: xarray/tests/init.py:169: in assertDataArrayAllClose assert_allclose(ar1, ar2, rtol=rtol, atol=atol) xarray/testing.py:125: in assert_allclose assert_allclose(a.variable, b.variable) a = <xarray.Variable (abc: 3)> array([ 0.504303, -0.53899 , -1.97593 ]) b = <xarray.Variable (abc: 3)> array([ 0.504303, -0.53899 , -0.175924]) rtol = 1e-05, atol = 1e-08, decode_bytes = True
xarray/testing.py:123: AssertionError
----------------------------- Captured stderr call -----------------------------
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build/xarray/tests/test_dataarray.py:1529: FutureWarning: the order of the arguments on DataArray.to_dataset has changed; you now need to supply self = <xarray.tests.test_dataarray.TestDataArray testMethod=test_groupby_sum>
xarray/tests/test_dataarray.py:1440: xarray/tests/init.py:169: in assertDataArrayAllClose assert_allclose(ar1, ar2, rtol=rtol, atol=atol) xarray/testing.py:125: in assert_allclose assert_allclose(a.variable, b.variable) a = <xarray.Variable (abc: 3)> array([ 45.861725, 46.894773, 4.057272]) b = <xarray.Variable (abc: 3)> array([ 45.861725, 46.894773, 0.877923]) rtol = 1e-05, atol = 1e-08, decode_bytes = True
xarray/testing.py:123: AssertionError ============= 3 failed, 1161 passed, 341 skipped in 40.75 seconds ============== ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
273569412 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-273569412 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MzU2OTQxMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-18T19:06:58Z | 2017-01-18T19:06:58Z | MEMBER | OK, thanks for looking into this! On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Ghislain Antony Vaillant notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
273561115 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-273561115 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MzU2MTExNQ== | ghisvail 1964655 | 2017-01-18T18:36:38Z | 2017-01-18T18:36:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | We'd need to wait for numpy-1.12.1 to be absolutely sure. I don't have time to deploy a dev version of numpy to test. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
273560457 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-273560457 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MzU2MDQ1Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-18T18:34:05Z | 2017-01-18T18:34:05Z | MEMBER | Were you able to verify that the xarray tests pass after the numpy fix? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
273559627 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-273559627 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MzU1OTYyNw== | ghisvail 1964655 | 2017-01-18T18:31:01Z | 2017-01-18T18:31:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It turned out to be a bug in numpy 1.12.0, fixed in 1.12.1, which made |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
272832666 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-272832666 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjgzMjY2Ng== | ghisvail 1964655 | 2017-01-16T11:04:48Z | 2017-01-16T11:04:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks, I'll iterate with the Debian maintainer of bottleneck. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 | |
272763117 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1208#issuecomment-272763117 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1208 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3Mjc2MzExNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-16T02:58:06Z | 2017-01-16T02:58:06Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the report. My guess is that this is an issue with the bottleneck build -- the large float values (e.g., 1e+248) in the final tests suggest some sort of overflow and/or memory corruption. The values summed in these tests are random numbers between 0 and 1. Unfortunately, I can't reduce this locally using the conda build of bottleneck 1.2.0 on OS X, and our build on Travis-CI (using Ubuntu and conda) is also succeeding. Do you have any more specific details that describe your test setup, other than using the pre-build bottleneck 1.2.0 package? If my hypothesis is correct, this test on bottleneck might trigger a test failure in the ubuntu build process (but it passed in bottleneck's tests on TravisCI): https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/compare/master...shoyer:possible-reduce-bug?expand=1#diff-a0a3ffc22e0a63118ba4a18e4ab845fc |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Test failures on Debian if built with bottleneck 200908727 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3