issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 200593854 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
501857505 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-501857505 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMTg1NzUwNQ== | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2019-06-13T20:00:57Z | 2019-06-13T20:00:57Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
315179563 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-315179563 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMxNTE3OTU2Mw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-07-13T19:34:04Z | 2017-07-13T19:34:04Z | MEMBER | @vnoel and @fmaussion - my apologies for being quite tardy in looking at this PR. I think this is a valuable change but I do have one comment on the implementation. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
272612691 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272612691 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjYxMjY5MQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-14T09:22:48Z | 2017-01-14T09:22:48Z | MEMBER | I know at least one usage where the In the end, I'm still in favor of this change:
- I suspect the large majority of the use cases are for cartopy
- it's still possible to override the this default behavior by setting the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
272416983 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272416983 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxNjk4Mw== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-13T10:59:53Z | 2017-01-13T10:59:53Z | MEMBER |
cartopy uses |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
272415578 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272415578 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxNTU3OA== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-13T10:52:32Z | 2017-01-13T10:52:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As it is, the xarray code becomes tied up with cartopy. If cartopy somehow changes its syntax (e.g. by renaming the Maybe there's another, more abstract way to do this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
272414825 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272414825 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxNDgyNQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-13T10:48:49Z | 2017-01-13T10:48:49Z | MEMBER |
Yes, I was about to ask @jhamman and @shoyer about their opinion about this. I'm actually not sure if this really is a corner case... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
272414593 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272414593 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxNDU5Mw== | vnoel 731499 | 2017-01-13T10:47:28Z | 2017-01-13T10:47:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | One concern I have is that it is conceivable that one might pass a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 | |
272412800 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1205#issuecomment-272412800 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1205 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjQxMjgwMA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2017-01-13T10:37:57Z | 2017-01-13T10:37:57Z | MEMBER | Thanks! I think we need to document this somewhere, and also some tests would be nice. Do you feel like trying to add the same functionality to normal 2d plots also? (this will represent a little more work so if you don't have time no big deal). Also, you should credit yourself in the "what's new" section of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
transfer projection to implied subplots when faceting 200593854 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4