issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 199188476 and user = 6130352 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • eric-czech · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Use masked arrays while preserving int · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
605697466 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1194#issuecomment-605697466 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1194 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNTY5NzQ2Ng== eric-czech 6130352 2020-03-29T20:37:29Z 2020-03-29T20:37:29Z NONE

I agree, I have this same issue with large genotyping data arrays often containing tiny integers and some degree of missingness in nearly 100% of raw datasets. Are there recommended workarounds now? I am thinking of constantly using Datasets instead of DataArrays with mask arrays to accompany every data array, but I'm not sure if that's the best interim solution.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Use masked arrays while preserving int 199188476

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);