home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

where issue = 195971828 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

These facets timed out: author_association, issue

user 1

  • shoyer · 8 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
274966778 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274966778 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk2Njc3OA== shoyer 1217238 2017-01-24T22:58:28Z 2017-01-24T22:58:28Z MEMBER

The built docs look pretty good to me, so I think we can go ahead with matplotlib 2.0: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/fix-docs/plotting.html

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Fabien Maussion notifications@github.com wrote:

@shoyer https://github.com/shoyer I've tested mpl on the fix-docs branch and they seem to build properly (see the dashboard https://readthedocs.org/projects/xray/builds/), but for some reason xarray's webpage is unreachable right now so I can't see how it looks like. It's getting late here in central europe so if you want to make the release later today go ahead, MPL2 can wait.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274960256, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKS1osL4YAfEmseT8ogKRvIqmlcSFywks5rVntWgaJpZM4LOzyA .

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
274946195 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274946195 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk0NjE5NQ== shoyer 1217238 2017-01-24T21:35:18Z 2017-01-24T21:35:18Z MEMBER

@rabernat the DataStore refactor will happen sometime soon I hope, but I will definitely coordinate with you!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
274945151 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274945151 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk0NTE1MQ== shoyer 1217238 2017-01-24T21:31:17Z 2017-01-24T21:31:17Z MEMBER

Certainly, give it a try!

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Fabien Maussion notifications@github.com wrote:

It is picky but it might be worth to pin mpl to v2 for nicer plots in the docs ;-) Am I allowed to try it out?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274944511, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKS1qt-_CC_qfNcXHNEOa5tIfTETEHEks5rVm0WgaJpZM4LOzyA .

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
274942102 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274942102 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk0MjEwMg== shoyer 1217238 2017-01-24T21:19:56Z 2017-01-24T21:19:56Z MEMBER

With the merge of #1222, I plan to issue the new release tonight or tomorrow morning (pending a successful doc build and a final check-over).

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
272667600 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-272667600 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjY2NzYwMA== shoyer 1217238 2017-01-15T01:52:50Z 2017-01-15T01:52:50Z MEMBER

@ghisvail Oops, I forgot to upload the source distribution to pypi (now fixed).

The final release should be some time this week, up to you if you want to wait.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
271793070 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-271793070 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MTc5MzA3MA== shoyer 1217238 2017-01-11T06:55:23Z 2017-01-11T06:55:23Z MEMBER

There is never an ideal time to make a release cut, but this has been dragging on for too long. I just sent out an email announcing a release candidate for v0.9.0: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/xarray/Yc6A45zXmwM

Unlimited dimensions will have to wait to the v0.9.1 release, but that release can follow pretty shortly given that the changes should be mostly backwards compatible.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
269354153 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-269354153 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2OTM1NDE1Mw== shoyer 1217238 2016-12-27T17:12:01Z 2016-12-27T17:12:01Z MEMBER

What's our status here? I'd like to get the release (maybe a release candidate) out this week if possible.

It would be great if someone else could take a look at #1166 and #1179.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828
268703015 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-268703015 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2ODcwMzAxNQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-12-22T02:34:10Z 2016-12-22T02:34:10Z MEMBER

I also really want to merge #964 (the "apply" function) but the current API is a little too confusing. We could merge it without exposing it as public API for now and/or start building simplified versions (e.g., with an optional dim argument instead of signature).

I agree that it should be a top priority but I don't want to let it hold up 0.9 any longer, so I think we should release without it. apply does not change any APIs in a breaking way so we can even both put it in a minor release if desried (though obviously it is a big feature).

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Things to complete before releasing xarray v0.9.0 195971828

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 8078.722ms · About: xarray-datasette