issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 195050684 and user = 743508 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Generated Dask graph is huge - performance issue? · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 266598007 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1161#issuecomment-266598007 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1161 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NjU5ODAwNw== | mangecoeur 743508 | 2016-12-13T00:29:16Z | 2016-12-13T00:29:16Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Seems to run a lot faster for me too... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generated Dask graph is huge - performance issue? 195050684 | |
| 266596464 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1161#issuecomment-266596464 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1161 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NjU5NjQ2NA== | mangecoeur 743508 | 2016-12-13T00:20:12Z | 2016-12-13T00:20:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Done with PR #1162 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generated Dask graph is huge - performance issue? 195050684 | |
| 266587849 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1161#issuecomment-266587849 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1161 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NjU4Nzg0OQ== | mangecoeur 743508 | 2016-12-12T23:32:19Z | 2016-12-12T23:33:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks, I've been looking around and I think i'm getting close, however i'm not sure the best way to turn the array slice i get from vindex into a DataArray variable. I'm thinking I might but together a draft PR for comments. This is what i have so far: ```python def isel_points(self, dim='points', **indexers): """Returns a new dataset with each array indexed pointwise along the specified dimension(s).
return concat([self.isel(**d) for d in[dict(zip(keys, inds)) for inds inzip(*[v for k, v in indexers])]],dim=dim, coords=coords, data_vars=data_vars)``` |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generated Dask graph is huge - performance issue? 195050684 | |
| 266519121 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1161#issuecomment-266519121 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1161 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NjUxOTEyMQ== | mangecoeur 743508 | 2016-12-12T18:59:15Z | 2016-12-12T18:59:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok I will have a look, where is this implemented (I always seem to have trouble pinpointing the dask-specific bits in the codebase :S ) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Generated Dask graph is huge - performance issue? 195050684 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1