home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

7 rows where issue = 193657418 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 5

  • shoyer 2
  • fmaussion 2
  • rabernat 1
  • jhamman 1
  • stale[bot] 1

author_association 2

  • MEMBER 6
  • NONE 1

issue 1

  • netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs · 7 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
459940409 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-459940409 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1OTk0MDQwOQ== jhamman 2443309 2019-02-02T06:33:44Z 2019-02-02T06:33:44Z MEMBER

Closing based on the recent documentation updates (e.g. #2430) and older PRs like #1169.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418
457193530 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-457193530 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1NzE5MzUzMA== stale[bot] 26384082 2019-01-24T13:19:58Z 2019-01-24T13:19:58Z NONE

In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418
269081539 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-269081539 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2OTA4MTUzOQ== fmaussion 10050469 2016-12-24T11:56:53Z 2016-12-24T11:56:53Z MEMBER

Partly addressed via https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1169

I'll leave the issue opened in case someone wants to add a more comprehensive netCDF doc later on

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418
265182668 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-265182668 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NTE4MjY2OA== shoyer 1217238 2016-12-06T15:40:26Z 2016-12-06T15:56:17Z MEMBER

The challenge here is that xarray has two big audiences (netCDF users and non-netCDF users), for which the right approach is very different. I tried to avoid being too netCDF specific in the docs to avoid turning off folks who aren't familiar with it. This is not to say that they would not appreciate learning more about netCDF, but I know that an overemphasis on domain specific file formats can quickly turn people off.

So we almost need two separate introduction/tutorial pages, one for people who know netCDF and one for people who don't.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418
265187263 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-265187263 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NTE4NzI2Mw== rabernat 1197350 2016-12-06T15:55:34Z 2016-12-06T15:55:34Z MEMBER

@shoyer I definitely see your point!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418
265186689 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-265186689 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NTE4NjY4OQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-12-06T15:53:43Z 2016-12-06T15:53:43Z MEMBER

@fmaussion yes, that's a really good point -- the intro for users who don't know netCDF should end with a call to arms about how great netCDF is :).

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418
265184523 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1154#issuecomment-265184523 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1154 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2NTE4NDUyMw== fmaussion 10050469 2016-12-06T15:46:21Z 2016-12-06T15:47:15Z MEMBER

See also: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/768#issuecomment-187226020

He wrote:

Looking back, I actually think the documentation could use some work to help people like me, who haven't used netcdf, realize it's great.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  netCDF reading is not prominent in the docs 193657418

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 807.337ms · About: xarray-datasette