issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 187608079 and user = 167164 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? · 7 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 259044958 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-259044958 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1OTA0NDk1OA== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-08T04:47:56Z | 2016-11-08T04:47:56Z | NONE | Ok, no worries. I'll try it if it gets desperate :) Thanks for your help, shoyer! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 | |
| 259041491 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-259041491 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1OTA0MTQ5MQ== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-08T04:16:26Z | 2016-11-08T04:16:26Z | NONE | So it would be more efficient to concat all of the datasets (subset for the relevant variables), and then just use a single .to_dataframe() call on the entire dataset? If so, that would require quite a bit of refactoring on my part, but it could be worth it. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 | |
| 259033970 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-259033970 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1OTAzMzk3MA== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-08T03:14:50Z | 2016-11-08T03:14:50Z | NONE | Yeah, I'm loading each file separately with |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 | |
| 259026069 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-259026069 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1OTAyNjA2OQ== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-08T02:19:01Z | 2016-11-08T02:19:01Z | NONE | Not easily - most scripts require multiple (up to 200, of which the linked one is one of the smallest, some are up to 10Mb) of these datasets in a specific directory structure, and rely on a couple of private python modules. I was just asking because I thought I might have been missing something obvious, but now I guess that isn't the case. Probably not worth spending too much time on this - if it starts becoming a real problem for me, I will try to generate something self-contained that shows the problem. Until then, maybe it's best to assume that xarray/pandas are doing the best they can given the requirements, and close this for now. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 | |
| 258774196 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-258774196 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODc3NDE5Ng== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-07T08:30:25Z | 2016-11-07T08:30:25Z | NONE | I loaded it from a netcdf file. There's an example you can play with at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50684199/MitraEFluxnet.1.4_flux.nc |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 | |
| 258755061 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-258755061 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODc1NTA2MQ== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-07T06:12:27Z | 2016-11-07T06:12:27Z | NONE | Slightly slower (using |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 | |
| 258753366 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1086#issuecomment-258753366 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1086 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODc1MzM2Ng== | naught101 167164 | 2016-11-07T05:56:26Z | 2016-11-07T05:56:26Z | NONE | Squeeze is pretty much identical in efficiency. Seems very slightly better (2-5%) on smaller datasets. (I still need to add the final I'm not calling
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Is there a more efficient way to convert a subset of variables to a dataframe? 187608079 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);

user 1