issue_comments
11 rows where issue = 186680248 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
274641329 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-274641329 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDY0MTMyOQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-23T22:41:22Z | 2017-01-23T22:41:22Z | MEMBER | Fixed by #1204 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
271462549 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-271462549 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MTQ2MjU0OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-10T01:42:26Z | 2017-01-10T01:42:49Z | MEMBER | @chunweiyuan import at the top of the method/ function,
This is the pretty standard way to get around circular imports. There's basically no way to avoid this issue with APIs designed to have lots of logic in method calls. (Other than gigantic files, which isn't a real fix.) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
270799884 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-270799884 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MDc5OTg4NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-01-06T00:39:32Z | 2017-01-06T00:39:32Z | MEMBER | I just merged #964. If you're up for it, I would suggest rewriting Let me know if you need any guidance on using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
261144196 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-261144196 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2MTE0NDE5Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-17T03:19:43Z | 2016-11-17T03:19:43Z | MEMBER | I would rather wait a little while here -- I think #964 will handle the logic we need to make add a
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
260158359 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-260158359 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2MDE1ODM1OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-13T00:36:27Z | 2016-11-13T00:36:27Z | MEMBER | What about simply adding a keyword argument |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
258718785 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-258718785 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODcxODc4NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-06T23:11:27Z | 2016-11-06T23:11:27Z | MEMBER | Use For now, maybe use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
258688677 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-258688677 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODY4ODY3Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-06T15:35:43Z | 2016-11-06T15:35:43Z | MEMBER | I think we should still call it |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
258682131 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-258682131 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODY4MjEzMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-06T13:50:54Z | 2016-11-06T13:50:54Z | MEMBER | Pandas implements this like: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
258237589 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-258237589 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODIzNzU4OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-03T18:45:19Z | 2016-11-03T18:45:19Z | MEMBER | Indeed, I think we definitely want to do an outer align first. That behavior for pandas looks very strange. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
258026397 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-258026397 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODAyNjM5Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-02T23:06:47Z | 2016-11-02T23:06:47Z | MEMBER | Sorry, nope not implemented yet. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 | |
257745190 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1072#issuecomment-257745190 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1072 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1Nzc0NTE5MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-11-02T01:09:45Z | 2016-11-02T01:09:45Z | MEMBER | I don't think this is the best fit for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow concat() to drop/replace duplicate index labels? 186680248 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1