issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 1694956396 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Task naming for general chunkmanagers · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1536054499 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7813#issuecomment-1536054499 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7813 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bjlTj | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-05T10:30:38Z | 2023-05-05T10:30:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ah I understand better now. This makes sense - if |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Task naming for general chunkmanagers 1694956396 | |
1535108194 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7813#issuecomment-1535108194 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7813 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bf-Ri | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-05-04T17:07:15Z | 2023-05-04T17:07:15Z | MEMBER |
That's neat!
I realise now that this is not true - but can we make it true for cubed in xarray? Using cubed with xarray creates array's with names like
I raised it here because it relates to an unfinished part of #7019 - where there is still dask-specific logic for naming individual tasks. I think that to solve this we will need to alter xarray code to allow |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Task naming for general chunkmanagers 1694956396 | |
1534281206 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7813#issuecomment-1534281206 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7813 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bc0X2 | tomwhite 85085 | 2023-05-04T08:22:05Z | 2023-05-04T08:22:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | If you hover over a node in the SVG representation you'll get a tooltip that shows the call stack and the line number of the top-level user function that invoked the computation. Does that help at all? (That said, I'm open to changing the way it is displayed, or how tasks are named in general.) BTW should this be moved to a cubed issue? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Task naming for general chunkmanagers 1694956396 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2