home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where issue = 1657396474 and user = 6628425 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • spencerkclark · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER 3
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1507109914 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7731#issuecomment-1507109914 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7731 IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z1Kwa spencerkclark 6628425 2023-04-13T14:50:15Z 2023-04-13T14:50:15Z MEMBER

Thanks for noting that @dcherian -- I think I got to all of them now.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas 1657396474
1506059299 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7731#issuecomment-1506059299 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7731 IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZxKQj spencerkclark 6628425 2023-04-12T22:42:26Z 2023-04-12T22:42:26Z MEMBER

Thanks all for the help! Fingers crossed things should be all green now. Happy to address any more review comments.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas 1657396474
1499107154 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7731#issuecomment-1499107154 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7731 IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZWo9S spencerkclark 6628425 2023-04-06T13:57:56Z 2023-04-06T13:57:56Z MEMBER

I'm fine waiting until #7724 is merged to let our main CI cover this. Indeed the upstream tests are flaky. Locally I just installed pandas 2 via pip to do testing during development.

{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 2,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas 1657396474

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 35.684ms · About: xarray-datasette