issue_comments

Table actions

5 rows where issue = 1639732867 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

author_association 4

issue 1

  • Delete built-in cfgrib backend · 5 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1572259965 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7670#issuecomment-1572259965 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7670 IC_kwDOAMm_X85dtsh9 headtr1ck 43316012 2023-06-01T15:22:33Z 2023-06-01T15:22:33Z COLLABORATOR

The cfgrib notebook in the documentation is broken. I guess it's related to this PR. See: https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ERA5-GRIB-example.html

Same problem with https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7841

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Delete built-in cfgrib backend 1639732867
1572174061 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7670#issuecomment-1572174061 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7670 IC_kwDOAMm_X85dtXjt malmans2 22245117 2023-06-01T14:34:44Z 2023-06-01T14:34:44Z CONTRIBUTOR

The cfgrib notebook in the documentation is broken. I guess it's related to this PR. See: https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ERA5-GRIB-example.html

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Delete built-in cfgrib backend 1639732867
1489880819 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7670#issuecomment-1489880819 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7670 IC_kwDOAMm_X85Yzcbz iainrussell 40060766 2023-03-30T08:11:57Z 2023-03-30T08:11:57Z NONE

Hi, I've tested cfgrib, and another package that uses cfgrib, with the main branch of xarray and all looks good!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Delete built-in cfgrib backend 1639732867
1488830579 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7670#issuecomment-1488830579 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7670 IC_kwDOAMm_X85YvcBz dcherian 2448579 2023-03-29T15:19:43Z 2023-03-29T15:19:43Z MEMBER

Should we ping cfgrib to let them know about this change, so they can transfer the removed tests, if they did not do this already?

cc @iainrussell

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Delete built-in cfgrib backend 1639732867
1487525733 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7670#issuecomment-1487525733 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7670 IC_kwDOAMm_X85Yqddl jhamman 2443309 2023-03-28T20:06:00Z 2023-03-28T20:06:00Z MEMBER

Should we ping cfgrib to let them know about this change, so they can transfer the removed tests, if they did not do this already?

☝️ @alexamici and @aurghs 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Delete built-in cfgrib backend 1639732867

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);