issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 1603957501 and user = 950575 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • ocefpaf · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Add optional min versions to conda-forge recipe (`run_constrained`) · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1498200620 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7573#issuecomment-1498200620 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7573 IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZTLos ocefpaf 950575 2023-04-05T21:47:19Z 2023-04-05T21:47:19Z CONTRIBUTOR

With the current PR we would end up with two different build numbers with differing behaviour, which might confuse folks.

+1

But I'd rely on @ocefpaf's expertise.

The PR is a good idea and we, conda-forge, even though about making something like that for all packages. The problem is that optional packages metadata in Python-land is super unreliable. So, doing it on a package bases and with the original authors as part of it, it is super safe and recommended.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Add optional min versions to conda-forge recipe (`run_constrained`) 1603957501

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);