issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 160009256 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- add geocolormesh · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
226502318 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-226502318 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNjUwMjMxOA== | mathause 10194086 | 2016-06-16T14:29:36Z | 2016-06-16T14:29:36Z | MEMBER | What may be possible: extend * This may conflict with the current |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
226480439 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-226480439 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNjQ4MDQzOQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-06-16T13:11:29Z | 2016-06-16T13:11:29Z | MEMBER |
Do you think it would be enough to expose the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
226411408 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-226411408 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNjQxMTQwOA== | mathause 10194086 | 2016-06-16T07:42:13Z | 2016-06-16T07:42:13Z | MEMBER | Yes is is possible to say I like the idea of doing Some questions:
- Would it also offer |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
226252313 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-226252313 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNjI1MjMxMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-06-15T17:03:07Z | 2016-06-15T17:03:07Z | MEMBER | I'm pretty sure it's possible to add cartopy axes to a FacetGrid using the What this code does is add the I agree that this is a good fit for xarray because the plotting API is difficult to extend externally. One nice way to present this to users could be to make a |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
226132209 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-226132209 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNjEzMjIwOQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-06-15T09:13:50Z | 2016-06-15T09:13:50Z | MEMBER | I also agree that this is a not to intrusive and useful "geo-specific" addition. Without looking at the implementation, I also wonder if it would be possible to add the same functionality to the existing framework without adding a specific function? The background is that there are other ways than pcolormesh to plot on a map (see also https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/657) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
225908579 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-225908579 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNTkwODU3OQ== | spencerahill 6200806 | 2016-06-14T14:56:30Z | 2016-06-14T14:56:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer maybe just a name change then? cartopy obviously is inherently geo-specific. Is it possible that other fields would find the utilities in geocolormesh useful? Or could the geocolormesh functionality be refactored into the existing plotting framework? (Just thinking out loud...not familiar with the plotting codebase at all) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
225772187 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-225772187 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNTc3MjE4Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-06-14T03:42:13Z | 2016-06-14T03:42:13Z | MEMBER | I was trying to avoid getting too much geo-specific functionality in xarray, but this does nicely extend the existing plotting methods, so I think this is a reasonable addition. Anyone else have opinions on this one? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 | |
225663415 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/882#issuecomment-225663415 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/882 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyNTY2MzQxNQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2016-06-13T18:14:04Z | 2016-06-13T18:14:04Z | MEMBER | These are the plots from above.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add geocolormesh 160009256 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4