issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 1562408536 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1412411490 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412411490 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UL7Bi | mwestphal 3129530 | 2023-02-01T17:08:31Z | 2023-02-01T17:08:31Z | NONE |
That was definitely not my goal, as I was about to publish a blog linking to that very section as an example. Of course, i'm merely a user here. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1412396521 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412396521 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UL3Xp | keewis 14808389 | 2023-02-01T17:00:14Z | 2023-02-01T17:00:14Z | MEMBER | thanks, that makes sense to me. I think that rules out option 3, so now we only need to decide whether we remove only the data url or the entire section (personally, I would lean towards the latter). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1412254964 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412254964 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ULUz0 | hetland 2599958 | 2023-02-01T15:30:32Z | 2023-02-01T15:30:32Z | NONE | In terms of maintenance burden, I would say that the future of the THREDDS server is uncertain. I am no longer at TAMU, so no longer in charge of keeping it up. And there are other issues that may make it difficult to keep up, even in the near term. So, I think relying on the accessability of this particular dataset even in the near term is not a good idea, unfortunately. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1412214395 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412214395 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ULK57 | keewis 14808389 | 2023-02-01T15:07:15Z | 2023-02-01T15:07:15Z | MEMBER | 1 is the status quo (minus the removal of the data server url): the cells are set to "raw", so they are not run. We don't want to hit the server during CI anyways, as hitting the server would slow down the docs build too much. It seems like there's at least two people who tried to follow the subsetting (or otherwise play with the raw data), so the section does have some value. However, I don't know how this compares to the burden of maintaining it, especially since we don't run it in CI. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1412165245 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412165245 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UK-59 | hetland 2599958 | 2023-02-01T14:37:22Z | 2023-02-01T14:37:22Z | NONE | So, that bit of code that references the THREDDS server was just to explain how the (heavily subsetted) data was processed and put into the xarray example datasets. It's not necessary for the example to run, though it could be interesting. I have three solutions, roughly in order of my preference:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1409080221 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1409080221 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85T_Nud | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-01-30T18:05:09Z | 2023-01-30T18:05:09Z | MEMBER | Oh oops, sorry! Perhaps we just delete that section unless @hetland has a suggestion |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1409066939 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1409066939 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85T_Ke7 | keewis 14808389 | 2023-01-30T17:56:04Z | 2023-01-30T17:56:04Z | MEMBER | don't we do that already? As far as I can tell, the url is there to explain where we got the data from and what preprocessing was done. Unless I'm missing something? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1409024668 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1409024668 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85T_AKc | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-01-30T17:25:34Z | 2023-01-30T17:25:34Z | MEMBER | Ah we can replace that line with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1408703594 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1408703594 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85T9xxq | keewis 14808389 | 2023-01-30T14:17:55Z | 2023-01-30T14:17:55Z | MEMBER | the data server is out of our control, so we can't fix this ourselves, unfortunately. We might be able to look for a different server for that model, but I don't know enough about the model to do that myself. Any ideas, @pydata/xarray? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4