issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 1548948097 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Typing of internal datatypes · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1397515014 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397515014 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TTGMG | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-19T19:49:19Z | 2023-01-19T19:49:19Z | MEMBER |
Yes, now I recall, it was here #6894. I think it could be interesting to try out: https://github.com/pmeier/array-protocol Another good read: https://github.com/data-apis/array-api/issues/229 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
1397480084 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397480084 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TS9qU | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-01-19T19:14:04Z | 2023-01-19T19:14:04Z | MEMBER |
When will the user be using this type annotation? Isn't all this typing stuff basically a dev feature (internally and downstream)? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
1397469153 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397469153 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TS6_h | headtr1ck 43316012 | 2023-01-19T19:05:08Z | 2023-01-19T19:05:08Z | COLLABORATOR |
But then |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
1397465527 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397465527 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TS6G3 | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-01-19T19:02:09Z | 2023-01-19T19:02:09Z | MEMBER | Doesn't the python array api standard effort have some type of duck array protocol we could import? I feel like this has been mentioned before. Then we would start with @Illviljan 's suggestion and replace it with the correct duck array protocol later. We might also consider that in the context of different distributed array backends dask arrays define a more specific API that includes methods like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
1397074522 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397074522 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TRapa | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-19T14:35:37Z | 2023-01-19T14:35:37Z | MEMBER | I've been thinking that a good and safe start on this issue is to replace all these raw |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3