issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 1548948097 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Typing of internal datatypes · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1397515014 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397515014 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TTGMG | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-19T19:49:19Z | 2023-01-19T19:49:19Z | MEMBER |
Yes, now I recall, it was here #6894. I think it could be interesting to try out: https://github.com/pmeier/array-protocol Another good read: https://github.com/data-apis/array-api/issues/229 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
| 1397480084 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397480084 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TS9qU | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-01-19T19:14:04Z | 2023-01-19T19:14:04Z | MEMBER |
When will the user be using this type annotation? Isn't all this typing stuff basically a dev feature (internally and downstream)? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
| 1397469153 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397469153 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TS6_h | headtr1ck 43316012 | 2023-01-19T19:05:08Z | 2023-01-19T19:05:08Z | COLLABORATOR |
But then |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
| 1397465527 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397465527 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TS6G3 | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-01-19T19:02:09Z | 2023-01-19T19:02:09Z | MEMBER | Doesn't the python array api standard effort have some type of duck array protocol we could import? I feel like this has been mentioned before. Then we would start with @Illviljan 's suggestion and replace it with the correct duck array protocol later. We might also consider that in the context of different distributed array backends dask arrays define a more specific API that includes methods like |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 | |
| 1397074522 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7457#issuecomment-1397074522 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7457 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TRapa | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-19T14:35:37Z | 2023-01-19T14:35:37Z | MEMBER | I've been thinking that a good and safe start on this issue is to replace all these raw |
{
"total_count": 3,
"+1": 3,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Typing of internal datatypes 1548948097 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3