issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 146287030 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- N-D rolling · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
458228295 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/819#issuecomment-458228295 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/819 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1ODIyODI5NQ== | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2019-01-28T17:38:57Z | 2019-01-28T17:38:57Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
N-D rolling 146287030 | |
208056716 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/819#issuecomment-208056716 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/819 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwODA1NjcxNg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-04-10T20:05:24Z | 2016-04-10T20:05:24Z | MEMBER | @magonser We could add support for strides, but for builtin operations like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
N-D rolling 146287030 | |
208022981 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/819#issuecomment-208022981 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/819 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwODAyMjk4MQ== | magonser 14014177 | 2016-04-10T17:34:26Z | 2016-04-10T17:35:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hello together, additional to forman's comments I would like to note that for the xarray rolling operation a stride would be useful in some use-cases. I have understood, that no work is currently planned, but wanted to leave this remark for further contributions. I.e.
with
Thanks for xarray! It's great! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
N-D rolling 146287030 | |
206429373 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/819#issuecomment-206429373 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/819 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNjQyOTM3Mw== | forman 206773 | 2016-04-06T15:29:27Z | 2016-04-06T15:29:27Z | NONE | Thanks for the prompt reply! Once we have decided to use xarray for our project(s) and once we familiarized with its internals, we'll be happy to contribute and support you! Currently we all feel a bit dizzy about the many options we have and how to decide which way to go: Create our own library using xarray or build on UK MetOffice's Iris, Apache OCW, or Max-Planck-Institute's CDO, etc. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
N-D rolling 146287030 | |
206417958 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/819#issuecomment-206417958 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/819 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwNjQxNzk1OA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2016-04-06T15:04:55Z | 2016-04-06T15:04:55Z | MEMBER | @forman - The main reason this isn't supported yet is that we haven't implemented it yet. I recently added the At this point, I don't know of any plans to extend this functionality although we could discuss further. The complexity of N-D rolling aggregations does increase a fair bit and we would ideally like to let a lower level package (e.g. bottleneck) handle most of that. Since you seem to have a tangible application for the N-D rolling feature, maybe this is something you want to contribute to? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
N-D rolling 146287030 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5