issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 1434498245 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Remove setuptools-scm-git-archive, require setuptools-scm>=7 · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1302724471 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7253#issuecomment-1302724471 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7253 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Npf93 | mwtoews 895458 | 2022-11-03T22:01:49Z | 2022-11-03T22:01:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've looked into this further, and what I see is that As for the updated format with a numeric match, I don't think it makes any difference. Testing with git 2.38.1:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove setuptools-scm-git-archive, require setuptools-scm>=7 1434498245 | |
1302122898 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7253#issuecomment-1302122898 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7253 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85NnNGS | keewis 14808389 | 2022-11-03T13:33:16Z | 2022-11-03T13:33:16Z | MEMBER | thanks for the PR, @mwtoews! I noticed that a few hours ago (probably just after you opened this PR) the documentation of Should we also be using that? Or would that require a development version of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove setuptools-scm-git-archive, require setuptools-scm>=7 1434498245 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2