home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where issue = 1419882372 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

  • headtr1ck 2
  • TomNicholas 1

author_association 2

  • COLLABORATOR 2
  • MEMBER 1

issue 1

  • Backends descriptions · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1289473145 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7200#issuecomment-1289473145 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7200 IC_kwDOAMm_X85M28x5 headtr1ck 43316012 2022-10-24T19:07:30Z 2022-10-24T19:07:30Z COLLABORATOR

Since the url points to our internal documentation I assume it would be beneficial to add some docstrings to the Entrypoint classes?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Backends descriptions 1419882372
1289312995 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7200#issuecomment-1289312995 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7200 IC_kwDOAMm_X85M2Vrj TomNicholas 35968931 2022-10-24T16:47:33Z 2022-10-24T16:47:45Z MEMBER

If one wants to get fancy, we could wrap the list_engines dict into a custom dict with a nice repr (maybe even html repr).

Whilst I don't want to discourage eager devs, in one of the community calls we did discuss how this would almost certainly be overkill for a little-used advanced feature.

{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 2,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Backends descriptions 1419882372
1288457749 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7200#issuecomment-1288457749 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7200 IC_kwDOAMm_X85MzE4V headtr1ck 43316012 2022-10-24T05:59:41Z 2022-10-24T05:59:41Z COLLABORATOR

If one wants to get fancy, we could wrap the list_engines dict into a custom dict with a nice __repr__ (maybe even html repr).

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Backends descriptions 1419882372

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 13.614ms · About: xarray-datasette