issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 137517563 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- ENH: Mosaic plot and DataArray · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
191114669 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/779#issuecomment-191114669 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/779 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE5MTExNDY2OQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2016-03-02T07:48:04Z | 2016-03-02T07:48:04Z | MEMBER | I tend to agree with @shoyer that mosaic plots are probably a quite unusual way to represent DataArrays (but I can only speak for me). Since the actual mosaic plot is done by statsmodels you should probably propose your suggestions for melioration there? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Mosaic plot and DataArray 137517563 | |
191097202 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/779#issuecomment-191097202 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/779 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE5MTA5NzIwMg== | scls19fr 109167 | 2016-03-02T06:55:37Z | 2016-03-02T07:32:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Mosaic plots are not so rare and widely used for categorical display. I suggest reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_plot https://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intelligence/are_mosaic_plots_worthwhile.pdf http://www.theusrus.de/blog/understanding-mosaic-plots/ and http://www.datavis.ca/papers/moshist.pdf |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Mosaic plot and DataArray 137517563 | |
191018889 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/779#issuecomment-191018889 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/779 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE5MTAxODg4OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-03-02T02:07:57Z | 2016-03-02T02:07:57Z | MEMBER | Interesting -- I haven't encountered mosaic plots before. If it's as simple as writing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Mosaic plot and DataArray 137517563 | |
190809686 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/779#issuecomment-190809686 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/779 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE5MDgwOTY4Ng== | scls19fr 109167 | 2016-03-01T16:54:56Z | 2016-03-01T16:55:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Converting to Pandas Series with hierachical index seems to help:
It's not a clear as R mosaic plot... but that's not so bad. What is your opinion about adding a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ENH: Mosaic plot and DataArray 137517563 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3