issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1294978633 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- to_array to create a dimension as last axis · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1176477717 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6754#issuecomment-1176477717 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6754 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GH6AV | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-07-06T17:12:25Z | 2022-07-06T17:12:25Z | MEMBER |
Haha, us both Ray! I do think that part of laziness is not having to remember too much — so hopefully I can trade you the costs of an extra method call for more consistency! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_array to create a dimension as last axis 1294978633 | |
1176378382 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6754#issuecomment-1176378382 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6754 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GHhwO | raybellwaves 17162724 | 2022-07-06T15:41:43Z | 2022-07-06T15:41:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I would say very little. I'm a lazy programmer. I appreciate the arguments here of not blending methods which could make them more prone to bugs. I doubt there's any noticeable overhead of computation cost with the extra Welcome to close. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_array to create a dimension as last axis 1294978633 | |
1176368145 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6754#issuecomment-1176368145 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6754 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GHfQR | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-07-06T15:32:12Z | 2022-07-06T15:32:12Z | MEMBER | @max-sixty yeah that's valid. @raybellwaves |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_array to create a dimension as last axis 1294978633 | |
1175783623 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6754#issuecomment-1175783623 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6754 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GFQjH | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-07-06T05:01:48Z | 2022-07-06T05:01:48Z | MEMBER | What's the advantage of this over the transpose call? The transpose approach is more modular, since it takes advantage of the orthogonality of the methods — i.e. we have one method for all usages, rather than kwargs in lots of methods. We've also managed to have |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_array to create a dimension as last axis 1294978633 | |
1175730605 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6754#issuecomment-1175730605 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6754 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GFDmt | raybellwaves 17162724 | 2022-07-06T03:12:52Z | 2022-07-06T03:12:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks. Made a PR before seeing your comment. Welcome to chime in on the PR |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_array to create a dimension as last axis 1294978633 | |
1175723941 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6754#issuecomment-1175723941 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6754 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85GFB-l | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-07-06T02:58:27Z | 2022-07-06T02:58:27Z | MEMBER | We could follow the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_array to create a dimension as last axis 1294978633 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3