issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where issue = 125708367 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • shoyer · 4 ✖

issue 1

  • DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order · 4 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
211418692 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-211418692 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxMTQxODY5Mg== shoyer 1217238 2016-04-18T15:04:30Z 2016-04-18T15:04:30Z MEMBER

OK, I didn't read your first post carefully last time. Your complaint was about the order of coordinates in ds.d1 and ds.d2, not the original DataArrays. So this is a more subtle issue than I thought.

We could add some sort of ad-hoc adjustment to the order in which we display coordinates, but I'm reluctant because it's not obvious to me what that "correct" order would be. For example, that you can directly supply the coords argument as a mapping with any arbitrary order to construct a DataArray.

I suppose once principled choice would always be to display coordinates corresponding to dimensions first in lists of coordinates, and to always display them in the same order as dimensions. If we do this, it should be consistent between both DataArray and Dataset.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367
174843391 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-174843391 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3NDg0MzM5MQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-01-26T05:41:28Z 2016-01-26T05:41:28Z MEMBER

This should be fixed in v0.7.0... please reopen if it resurfaces.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367
170155759 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-170155759 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3MDE1NTc1OQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-01-08T23:28:44Z 2016-01-08T23:28:44Z MEMBER

yes, in the next week, hopefully.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367
170149315 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/712#issuecomment-170149315 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/712 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3MDE0OTMxNQ== shoyer 1217238 2016-01-08T22:49:37Z 2016-01-08T22:50:03Z MEMBER

I think this may have been fixed by the recent rewrite of DataArray internals. On master, I have:

``` In [2]: d1 Out[2]: <xray.DataArray (foo: 2, bar: 2)> array([[ 0.00000000e+000, 0.00000000e+000], [ 2.15725662e-314, 2.15893204e-314]]) Coordinates: * foo (foo) int64 0 1 * bar (bar) int64 0 1

In [3]: d2 Out[3]: <xray.DataArray (bar: 2, foo: 2)> array([[ 0.00000000e+000, 0.00000000e+000], [ 2.15906985e-314, 2.14458868e-314]]) Coordinates: * bar (bar) int64 0 1 * foo (foo) int64 0 1 ```

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   DataArrays should display their coordinates in the natural order 125708367

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);