issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 124441012 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Transpose modifies dtype of index, when a PeriodIndex · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168527832 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/692#issuecomment-168527832 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/692 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODUyNzgzMg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2016-01-03T18:41:04Z | 2016-01-03T18:41:04Z | MEMBER | OK, I guess that's how I think about the distinction with Indexes - they're role is for selection in one dimension, each. Maybe this is a more conceptual issue then... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Transpose modifies dtype of index, when a PeriodIndex 124441012 | |
| 168355707 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/692#issuecomment-168355707 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/692 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODM1NTcwNw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2016-01-02T01:46:09Z | 2016-01-02T01:46:09Z | MEMBER | That did fix it! Apologies for not testing on master. On the broader issue, I hadn't thought of the need to expand dims / indexes to more than one dimension. I was thinking that there would be a 1D index per dim, and the result of slicing a multidimensional array would be the intersection of each dim's slice. Am I missing something more fundamental? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Transpose modifies dtype of index, when a PeriodIndex 124441012 | |
| 168348251 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/692#issuecomment-168348251 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/692 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODM0ODI1MQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2016-01-01T23:07:06Z | 2016-01-01T23:07:06Z | MEMBER | Yeah, that seems fairly hacky (presumably this is would still be a problem if we have From my POV I'm still thinking whether XRay can fall back to pandas indexing more extensively (as discussed here). Dims could be stored as Pandas indexes rather than dask / numpy arrays, and the (much cleaner) XRay indexing API could be a simple wrapper of the Pandas API. And it sounds like from your comment the lazy contract could still be honored, if they're loaded when needed? Does that make sense? What are the arguments in the other direction? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Transpose modifies dtype of index, when a PeriodIndex 124441012 | |
| 168138939 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/692#issuecomment-168138939 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/692 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE2ODEzODkzOQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2015-12-31T07:20:11Z | 2016-01-01T22:12:08Z | MEMBER | Also peculiar - setting the ``` python In [80]: ds.date = date ds, ds.date.dtype, ds['number 1'].date.dtype Out[80]: (<xray.Dataset> Dimensions: (date: 10) Coordinates: * date (date) int64 10957 10958 10959 10960 10961 10962 10963 10964 ... Data variables: number 1 (date) float64 0.1225 0.7202 0.5921 0.3005 0.8746 0.4186 ... number 2 (date) float64 0.1225 0.7202 0.5921 0.3005 0.8746 0.4186 ... number 3 (date) float64 0.1225 0.7202 0.5921 0.3005 0.8746 0.4186 ... number 4 (date) float64 0.1225 0.7202 0.5921 0.3005 0.8746 nan nan nan ..., dtype('O'), dtype('int64')) ``` Currently my workaround is |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Transpose modifies dtype of index, when a PeriodIndex 124441012 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1