issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 117039129 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- groupby very slow compared to pandas · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200417621 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/659#issuecomment-200417621 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/659 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIwMDQxNzYyMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2016-03-23T16:13:32Z | 2016-03-23T16:13:32Z | MEMBER | Another approach here (rather than writing something new with Numba) would be to write a pure NumPy engine for groupby that relies on reordering data and |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby very slow compared to pandas 117039129 | |
157130467 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/659#issuecomment-157130467 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/659 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NzEzMDQ2Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-11-16T18:37:51Z | 2015-11-16T18:37:51Z | MEMBER | Agreed! If you'd like to make a pull request that would be greatly appreciated On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Antony Lee notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby very slow compared to pandas 117039129 | |
156921310 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/659#issuecomment-156921310 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/659 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NjkyMTMxMA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-11-16T05:40:09Z | 2015-11-16T05:40:09Z | MEMBER | Yes, switching to pandas for these operations is certainly a recommended approach :). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby very slow compared to pandas 117039129 | |
156915727 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/659#issuecomment-156915727 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/659 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NjkxNTcyNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-11-16T04:57:24Z | 2015-11-16T04:57:24Z | MEMBER | Yes, I'm afraid this is a known issue. Grouped aggregations are currently implemented with a loop in pure Python, which, of course, is pretty slow. I've done some exploratory work to rewrite them in Numba, which shows some encouraging preliminary results: ``` from numba import guvectorize, jit import pandas as pd import numpy as np @guvectorize(['(float64[:], int64[:], float64[:])'], '(x),(x),(y)', nopython=True) def _grouped_mean(values, int_labels, target): count = np.zeros(len(target), np.int64) for i in range(len(values)): val = values[i] if not np.isnan(val): lab = int_labels[i] target[lab] += val count[lab] += 1 target /= count def move_axis_to_end(array, axis): array = np.asarray(array) return np.rollaxis(array, axis, start=array.ndim) def grouped_mean(values, by, axis=-1): int_labels, uniques = pd.factorize(by, sort=True) values = move_axis_to_end(values, axis) target = np.zeros(values.shape[:-1] + uniques.shape) _grouped_mean(values, int_labels, target) return target, uniques values = np.random.RandomState(0).rand(int(1e6)) values[::50] = np.nan by = np.random.randint(50, size=int(1e6)) df = pd.DataFrame({'x': values, 'y': by}) np.testing.assert_allclose(grouped_mean(values, by)[0], df.groupby('y')['x'].mean()) %timeit grouped_mean(values, by) # 100 loops, best of 3: 15.3 ms per loop %timeit df.groupby('y').mean() # 10 loops, best of 3: 21.4 ms per loop ``` Unfortunately, I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the near future. If you or anyone else is interested in taking the lead on this, it would be greatly appreciated! Note that we can't reuse the routines from pandas because they are only designed for 1D or at most 2D data. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby very slow compared to pandas 117039129 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1