issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 1138440632 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Allow to parse more backend kwargs to pydap backend · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1041499267 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6276#issuecomment-1041499267 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6276 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-FASD | jgliss 12813228 | 2022-02-16T13:36:28Z | 2022-02-16T13:36:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks, rethinking it, I agree that it is better to set the allowed arguments explicitly. I updated it accordingly and hope this looks fine. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow to parse more backend kwargs to pydap backend 1138440632 | |
1041249397 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6276#issuecomment-1041249397 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6276 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-EDR1 | aurghs 35919497 | 2022-02-16T08:46:05Z | 2022-02-16T08:46:24Z | COLLABORATOR | I would prefer to avoid using **kwargs, the explicit list of parameters would make the code more readable. But I think it's fine that way too :) |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow to parse more backend kwargs to pydap backend 1138440632 | |
1040590938 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6276#issuecomment-1040590938 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6276 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-Biha | jgliss 12813228 | 2022-02-15T17:49:52Z | 2022-02-15T17:49:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
@mathause thanks for your comments, I implemented your suggestion using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow to parse more backend kwargs to pydap backend 1138440632 | |
1040230765 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6276#issuecomment-1040230765 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6276 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84-AKlt | mathause 10194086 | 2022-02-15T12:45:53Z | 2022-02-15T12:45:53Z | MEMBER | Looks like you need to define a See for example: If you want to keep the named arguments I would probably avoid ```python kwargs = {"a": 5, "b": None} only pass on kwargs that are not None -> pydap has some defaults that are not Nonekwargs = {key: value for key, value in kwargs.items() if value is not None} ``` |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow to parse more backend kwargs to pydap backend 1138440632 | |
1040074548 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6276#issuecomment-1040074548 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6276 | IC_kwDOAMm_X849_kc0 | jgliss 12813228 | 2022-02-15T09:57:18Z | 2022-02-15T09:57:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am not sure if the proposed changes are in compliance with the plugin restrictions related to parsing of **kwargs, etc. which is likely for very good reason. So, we could also be more explicit regarding how to deal with pydap's defaults, directly in PydapBackendEntrypoint, and set the defaults directly (which could lead to unnoticed deviations from pydap's defaults in upcoming releases). I appreciate comments and suggestions. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow to parse more backend kwargs to pydap backend 1138440632 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3