issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where issue = 112085412 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

author_association 2

issue 1

  • Remove the encoding attribute from xray.DataArray? · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
459032944 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/628#issuecomment-459032944 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/628 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1OTAzMjk0NA== stale[bot] 26384082 2019-01-30T17:26:42Z 2019-01-30T17:26:42Z NONE

In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Remove the encoding attribute from xray.DataArray? 112085412
149929109 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/628#issuecomment-149929109 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/628 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0OTkyOTEwOQ== jhamman 2443309 2015-10-21T15:17:54Z 2015-10-21T15:17:54Z MEMBER

Certainly, if we get rid of the encoding attribute, we need to keep the time attributes intact. That is a fine solution in my view.

I'm not tied to my fix for the coordinates attribute. The balance we need to strike is to not go too far in supporting everything in the CF conventions while not working against supported features in the conventions.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Remove the encoding attribute from xray.DataArray? 112085412
149309546 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/628#issuecomment-149309546 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/628 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0OTMwOTU0Ng== shoyer 1217238 2015-10-19T18:45:24Z 2015-10-19T18:45:24Z MEMBER

I agree that reading a noleap calendar and writing it as standard seems like a very bad idea. What about simply leaving the calendar attribute intact when reading from netCDF files?

I'm less sure about what a good solution looks like for preserving variable specific coordinates. I know you just added that fix, but what are the actual use cases for that information? If coordinates are do not apply to all variables in your dataset, then perhaps an xray.Dataset is not the right model for your problem.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Remove the encoding attribute from xray.DataArray? 112085412
149240760 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/628#issuecomment-149240760 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/628 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0OTI0MDc2MA== jhamman 2443309 2015-10-19T15:01:13Z 2015-10-19T15:01:13Z MEMBER

@shoyer - It would be nice to simplify the Variable object, however, until NumPy can support custom datatypes, I don't think this is very practical. How would you propose we round trip the coordinates and time variables? Reading a time variable with a noleap calendar and writing it out as a standard calendar seems like a bad idea.

In the climate modeling world, non-standard calendars are ubiquitous and I know of many people that have come to xray because we (partially) support those calendars. Leaving the encoding attribute/dictionary in Variable objects seems necessary to continue supporting the netCDF variable/attribute relationships.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Remove the encoding attribute from xray.DataArray? 112085412

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);