home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where issue = 108983672 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

  • shoyer 2
  • jhamman 1

issue 1

  • Spring cleaning · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER 3
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
144540055 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/594#issuecomment-144540055 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/594 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDU0MDA1NQ== shoyer 1217238 2015-09-30T20:55:43Z 2015-09-30T20:55:43Z MEMBER

Sure, go ahead and set that up if you like. As long as it doesn't mark a build as failing, the info can't hurt. I'll note that I don't agree with many of it's "errors", though :). For example, as long as you write pure functions (which you should be doing anyways), it's perfectly fine to have mutable default argument.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Spring cleaning 108983672
144537098 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/594#issuecomment-144537098 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/594 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDUzNzA5OA== jhamman 2443309 2015-09-30T20:42:19Z 2015-09-30T20:42:19Z MEMBER

@shoyer - Thanks for merging. How would you feel about adding Lanscape to our build checks?

If you haven't used Landscape before, its a style checker, much like what I was getting in my linter. I ran it over my forks master branch to see what the output was like: https://landscape.io/github/jhamman/xray/2

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Spring cleaning 108983672
144485566 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/594#issuecomment-144485566 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/594 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDQ4NTU2Ng== shoyer 1217238 2015-09-30T17:36:20Z 2015-09-30T17:36:20Z MEMBER

OK, thanks!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Spring cleaning 108983672

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 563.355ms · About: xarray-datasette