issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where issue = 108623921 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • jhamman · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • distarray backend? · 2 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
453800603 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/591#issuecomment-453800603 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/591 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MzgwMDYwMw== jhamman 2443309 2019-01-13T04:11:08Z 2019-01-13T04:11:08Z MEMBER

Closing this old issue. The distrarray project seems to be done and we have more recent issues discussing flexible array interfaces.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   distarray backend? 108623921
144171481 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/591#issuecomment-144171481 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/591 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDE3MTQ4MQ== jhamman 2443309 2015-09-29T19:58:27Z 2015-09-29T19:58:27Z MEMBER

I think this is an interesting idea. I was just asking @shoyer the other day if we could use dask.distributed with xray objects.

@shoyer will be able to speak more to the applicability and effort required to implement distarray. I'm not sure how many array abstractions we want in xray. Currently we have two (numpy and dask). Fully distributed arrays may be the logical extension.

One major drawback I see is that we don't have a parallel netCDF library in python so I/O will be an issue.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   distarray backend? 108623921

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);