issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1057355557 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 981408883 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6003#issuecomment-981408883 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6003 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846fxxz | RubendeBruin 34062862 | 2021-11-29T08:49:02Z | 2021-11-29T08:49:02Z | NONE | "does that work on your end?" yes it does. Will remove the xfail and then we can merge once https://github.com/pydata/bottleneck/pull/382 is merged. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) 1057355557 | |
| 979412541 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6003#issuecomment-979412541 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6003 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846YKY9 | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-11-25T18:22:47Z | 2021-11-25T18:22:47Z | MEMBER | @RubendeBruin it seems my guidance was bad — the test failures suggest that because this is a segfault So instead, let's leave this open until bottleneck does a release, and then merge this as a passing test — does that work on your end? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) 1057355557 | |
| 979285475 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6003#issuecomment-979285475 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6003 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846XrXj | RubendeBruin 34062862 | 2021-11-25T15:03:17Z | 2021-11-25T15:03:17Z | NONE | I've added xfail , thanks for the link. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) 1057355557 | |
| 979242142 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6003#issuecomment-979242142 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6003 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846Xgye | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-11-25T14:05:10Z | 2021-11-25T14:05:10Z | MEMBER |
https://docs.pytest.org/en/6.2.x/skipping.html — it marks the test as "expected failure".
Great that it's fixed upstream! We can either wait for it to be released and then merge this, or merge this now with the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) 1057355557 | |
| 979146287 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6003#issuecomment-979146287 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6003 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846XJYv | RubendeBruin 34062862 | 2021-11-25T12:01:38Z | 2021-11-25T12:01:38Z | NONE | Hi @max-sixty , what is a Also, the issue turned out to be bottleneck-bug , ref: https://github.com/pydata/bottleneck/issues/393#issuecomment-978017397 (fix available) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) 1057355557 | |
| 973230283 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6003#issuecomment-973230283 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6003 | IC_kwDOAMm_X846AlDL | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-11-18T20:20:56Z | 2021-11-18T20:20:56Z | MEMBER | Great! If you add an |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Added test for issue #6002 (currently fails) 1057355557 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2