issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 1043746973 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1016816597 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1016816597 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848m2PV | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-01-19T19:54:49Z | 2022-01-19T19:54:49Z | MEMBER | I think you can use a lot of @dcherian's code as a base and then for starters see if it simply passes all the tests (including the ones you added here). If you make a draft PR here it's easier to help out as well if you're getting stuck. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` 1043746973 | |
1016805677 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1016805677 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848mzkt | slevang 39069044 | 2022-01-19T19:39:57Z | 2022-01-19T19:39:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Not sure I understand the blockwise approach well enough to make a PR, but maybe I'll give it a try at some point. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` 1043746973 | |
1016791909 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1016791909 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848mwNl | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-01-19T19:21:56Z | 2022-01-19T19:21:56Z | MEMBER | @slevang Yeah, the blockwise approach seems indeed nice. You're very welcome to continue with the blockwise approach in a different PR if you want to. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` 1043746973 | |
1015887354 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1015887354 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848jTX6 | slevang 39069044 | 2022-01-18T22:21:49Z | 2022-01-18T22:45:16Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Definitely! I got distracted is all, and @dcherian posted a nice solution in #5629 that could allow us to preserve the ability to fit along a chunked dimension using blockwise operations and the dask I'm happy to pick this back up and finish it off if there is consensus on the right way forward, but the blockwise approach seemed promising so I put this on hold. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` 1043746973 | |
1015866453 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1015866453 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933 | IC_kwDOAMm_X848jORV | mathause 10194086 | 2022-01-18T21:50:48Z | 2022-01-18T21:50:48Z | MEMBER | @slevang are you still interested to continue this PR? I think that would be a worthwhile addition and should not be too much left to do. (What would be nice, however, are tests for the issues this fixes.) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` 1043746973 | |
959541609 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-959541609 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933 | IC_kwDOAMm_X845MXFp | github-actions[bot] 41898282 | 2021-11-03T15:56:14Z | 2021-11-03T15:56:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Unit Test Results6 files 6 suites 58m 4s :stopwatch: 16 290 tests 14 551 :heavy_check_mark: 1 739 :zzz: 0 :x: 90 936 runs 82 738 :heavy_check_mark: 8 198 :zzz: 0 :x: Results for commit 62b4637d. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reimplement `.polyfit()` with `apply_ufunc` 1043746973 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4