issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 100295585 and user = 221526 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- support for units · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
483799967 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-483799967 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4Mzc5OTk2Nw== | dopplershift 221526 | 2019-04-16T18:54:37Z | 2019-04-16T18:54:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer I agree with that wrapping order. I think I'd also be in favor of starting with an experiment to disable coercing to arrays. @nbren12 The non-communicative multiplication is a consequence of operator dispatch in Python, and the reason why we want |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
support for units 100295585 | |
229421229 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-229421229 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyOTQyMTIyOQ== | dopplershift 221526 | 2016-06-29T17:02:28Z | 2016-06-29T17:02:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I agree that custom dtypes is the right solution (and I'll go dig some more there). In the meantime, I'm not sure why you couldn't wrap an xarray |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
support for units 100295585 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1