issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where issue = 100295585 and user = 1386642 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • nbren12 · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • support for units · 3 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
483807351 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-483807351 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MzgwNzM1MQ== nbren12 1386642 2019-04-16T19:16:19Z 2019-04-16T19:16:19Z CONTRIBUTOR

Would __array_function__ solve the problem with operator precedence? I thought they are separate issues because __mul__ and __rmul__ need not call any numpy functions, and will therefore not necessary dispatch to __array_function__. 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   support for units 100295585
482643700 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-482643700 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MjY0MzcwMA== nbren12 1386642 2019-04-12T16:45:17Z 2019-04-12T16:45:17Z CONTRIBUTOR

One additional issue. It seems like pint has some odd behavior with dask. Multiplication (and I assume addition) is not commutative: ``` In [42]: da.ones((10,)) * ureg.m Out[42]: dask.array<mul, shape=(10,), dtype=float64, chunksize=(10,)>

In [43]: ureg.m * da.ones((10,)) Out[43]: dask.array<mul, shape=(10,), dtype=float64, chunksize=(10,)> <Unit('meter')> ```

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   support for units 100295585
482639629 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/525#issuecomment-482639629 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/525 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MjYzOTYyOQ== nbren12 1386642 2019-04-12T16:32:25Z 2019-04-12T16:32:25Z CONTRIBUTOR

@rabernat recent post inspired me to check out this issue. What would this issue entail now that __array_function__ is in numpy? Is there some reason this is more complicated than adding an appropriate __array_function__ to pint's quantity class?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   support for units 100295585

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);