issue_comments
7 rows where author_association = "NONE" and user = 865212 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- acrosby · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1267558344 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7093#issuecomment-1267558344 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7093 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LjWfI | acrosby 865212 | 2022-10-04T20:46:32Z | 2022-10-04T20:46:32Z | NONE | I believe NetCDF, CF-Conventions, and |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray allows several types for netcdf attributes. Is it expected ? 1388326248 | |
517736527 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1499#issuecomment-517736527 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1499 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzczNjUyNw== | acrosby 865212 | 2019-08-02T15:08:24Z | 2019-08-02T15:08:24Z | NONE | I think I side with @jhamman now on this issue. Labeled access to this kind of dataarray and broadcasting operations are not useful in my cases, and working in straight numpy or pandas ends up making more sense. We just drop the appropriate variables upon opening the relevant files. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reusing coordinate doesn't show in the dimensions 247697176 | |
405990579 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1524#issuecomment-405990579 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1524 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTk5MDU3OQ== | acrosby 865212 | 2018-07-18T16:20:38Z | 2018-07-18T16:20:38Z | NONE | Thanks @shoyer I had forgotten that the dask implementation has its own problems anyway. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
(trivial) xarray.quantile silently resolves dask arrays 252548859 | |
404613718 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1524#issuecomment-404613718 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1524 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNDYxMzcxOA== | acrosby 865212 | 2018-07-12T18:51:42Z | 2018-07-12T18:55:11Z | NONE | Now that SciPy is going on, is there any momentum here for trying to add the dask implementation in someway? This is an issue for some of our workloads, would be great if someone was looking into it or could point me in the direction to start adapting the current source to support it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
(trivial) xarray.quantile silently resolves dask arrays 252548859 | |
326286406 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1499#issuecomment-326286406 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1499 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNjI4NjQwNg== | acrosby 865212 | 2017-08-31T12:54:22Z | 2017-08-31T12:54:22Z | NONE | @jhamman I'm interested in helping, but I definitely can't be timely unless we can get a project here at work that I can leverage for time. What were you thinking for test coverage? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reusing coordinate doesn't show in the dimensions 247697176 | |
324975826 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1499#issuecomment-324975826 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1499 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMyNDk3NTgyNg== | acrosby 865212 | 2017-08-25T16:49:07Z | 2017-08-25T16:49:07Z | NONE | This is important for some of my use cases, it's something we do a lot--as noted it is not forbidden by the netcdf format or CF standards. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reusing coordinate doesn't show in the dimensions 247697176 | |
293593843 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1301#issuecomment-293593843 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1301 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MzU5Mzg0Mw== | acrosby 865212 | 2017-04-12T14:24:44Z | 2017-04-12T14:25:29Z | NONE | @friedrichknuth Did you try tests with the most recent version |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
open_mfdataset() significantly slower on 0.9.1 vs. 0.8.2 212561278 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4