home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

8 rows where author_association = "NONE" and user = 4451957 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

issue 6

  • Default reading netCDF3 files with scipy.io instead of netCDF4? 2
  • scikit-xray vs xray 2
  • Journal of Open Research Software 1
  • Include data in repository for examples 1
  • "weird" plot 1
  • Complete renaming xray -> xarray 1

user 1

  • hainm · 8 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 8 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
171748412 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/704#issuecomment-171748412 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/704 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE3MTc0ODQxMg== hainm 4451957 2016-01-14T19:16:49Z 2016-01-14T19:16:49Z NONE

:+1: for import xarray as xr

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Complete renaming xray -> xarray 124867009
159316714 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/663#issuecomment-159316714 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/663 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1OTMxNjcxNA== hainm 4451957 2015-11-24T16:09:25Z 2015-11-24T16:09:25Z NONE

Hi

It seems that I am only one having dirty mind, so I am closing this.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  "weird" plot 117881465
144646505 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/599#issuecomment-144646505 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/599 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDY0NjUwNQ== hainm 4451957 2015-10-01T07:49:20Z 2015-10-01T07:49:20Z NONE

To rename. :p

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  scikit-xray vs xray 109242847
144642390 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/599#issuecomment-144642390 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/599 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NDY0MjM5MA== hainm 4451957 2015-10-01T07:24:48Z 2015-10-01T07:24:48Z NONE

we've been considering renaming this package

so I guess you should rename before it's too late. :P

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  scikit-xray vs xray 109242847
128847631 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/510#issuecomment-128847631 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/510 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyODg0NzYzMQ== hainm 4451957 2015-08-07T22:26:03Z 2015-08-07T22:26:03Z NONE

+1 for this. might be

python from xray import datafiles

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Include data in repository for examples 98810125
108033070 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/290#issuecomment-108033070 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/290 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEwODAzMzA3MA== hainm 4451957 2015-06-02T17:58:15Z 2015-06-02T17:58:15Z NONE

@shoyer supposed Zenodo will last long. I myself prefer to publish software in a journal or conference.

Hai

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Journal of Open Research Software 51518779
107353873 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/368#issuecomment-107353873 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/368 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEwNzM1Mzg3Mw== hainm 4451957 2015-06-01T08:09:29Z 2015-06-01T10:53:08Z NONE

ah, great. thanks.

by the way, I got similar speed test as yours (scipy is ~4 times faster)

Hai

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Default reading netCDF3 files with scipy.io instead of netCDF4? 60766810
107341524 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/368#issuecomment-107341524 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/368 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEwNzM0MTUyNA== hainm 4451957 2015-06-01T07:36:44Z 2015-06-01T07:36:44Z NONE

I am not sure if this bug is solved or not wit scipy netcdf

https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/3960

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Default reading netCDF3 files with scipy.io instead of netCDF4? 60766810

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 13.656ms · About: xarray-datasette