issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where author_association = "NONE" and user = 41797673 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • maximemorariu · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
673965016 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4261#issuecomment-673965016 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4261 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3Mzk2NTAxNg== maximemorariu 41797673 2020-08-14T08:46:13Z 2020-08-14T08:46:13Z NONE

So just to know, should we hope for a fix in the next release? Many thanks 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   to_zarr with append_dim behavior changed in 0.16.0 release  664611511
662563406 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4241#issuecomment-662563406 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4241 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2MjU2MzQwNg== maximemorariu 41797673 2020-07-22T16:45:42Z 2020-07-22T16:45:42Z NONE

This is a fundamental problem that is rather hard to solve without creating a copy of the data.

We just released the rechunker package, which makes it easy to create a copy of your data with a different chunking scheme (e.g contiguous in time, chunked in space). If you have enough disk space to store a copy, this might be a good solution.

Thanks for confirming and pointing me to rechunker, that looks nice.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Parallel tasks on subsets of a dask array wrapped in an xarray Dataset 662982199
662509778 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4241#issuecomment-662509778 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4241 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY2MjUwOTc3OA== maximemorariu 41797673 2020-07-22T15:09:24Z 2020-07-22T15:09:24Z NONE

Thanks for your answer. Yes I looked at apply_ufunc and map_blocks and cannot use these here. The reason is that my function here must be applied along the time dimension (e.g., a rolling median in time), but my data is chunked across the time dimension. I could of course re-chunk the data (create a copy where there are no chunks along the time dimension), but I would like to know if this can be avoided.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Parallel tasks on subsets of a dask array wrapped in an xarray Dataset 662982199

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);