issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "NONE" and user = 22258697 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- rbavery · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
521758170 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2808#issuecomment-521758170 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2808 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMTc1ODE3MA== | rbavery 22258697 | 2019-08-15T19:02:51Z | 2021-07-21T16:47:47Z | NONE | Ryan Abernathey gave a helpful answer for how to apply a pixel wise function using dask and apply_ufunc: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57419541/how-to-use-apply-ufunc-with-numpy-digitize-for-each-image-along-time-dimension-o/57513184#57513184 I think the docs could improve on showing how to use apply_ufunc if we have a function that needs to be applied image-wise, like an image filter or segmentation, if we are chunking by time. Or, if the function needs to be applied window-wise, in which case the chunks are spatial (maybe DataArray.rolling and DataArray.reduce solve this case, but DataArray.reduce lacks an example). Having examples that speak to these 2 specific use cases would, I think, help newcomers (like myself) that are coming from any domain that works with 2D ('x', 'y') or 3D ('x', 'y', 'time') arrays. Currently the two examples in the docs show how to apply_ufunc with a 1D array http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/computation.html#comput-wrapping-custom And two 2D arrays ('place', 'time') http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/dask.html#automatic-parallelization Some other comments on my, and possibly others', points of confusion.
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improving documentation on `apply_ufunc` 420584430 | |
809858535 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-809858535 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwOTg1ODUzNQ== | rbavery 22258697 | 2021-03-30T02:31:54Z | 2021-03-30T02:31:54Z | NONE | I ran into the same issue as @bradyrx with writable arrays and apply_ufunc. An addition to the docs FAQ or apply_ufunc docs would help clarify that you can't write to the array inputs in the ufunc. I also want to +1 @bradyrx 's idea of making an arg to apply_ufunc that copies the input arrays to handle this common use case. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | |
802095333 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5049#issuecomment-802095333 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMjA5NTMzMw== | rbavery 22258697 | 2021-03-18T16:38:04Z | 2021-03-18T16:38:04Z | NONE | Sorry, I thought I attached it to the original issue, here is the test file I'm using: test.zip The test file @keewis mentioned does not produce the error. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray.DataArray > None kills kernel 834368403 | |
801680295 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5049#issuecomment-801680295 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMTY4MDI5NQ== | rbavery 22258697 | 2021-03-18T06:56:35Z | 2021-03-18T06:56:35Z | NONE | I attached the test.tif as a zip file, is that reproducible enough? I don't know what about the file is causing the issue. On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 10:02 PM Maximilian Roos @.***> wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray.DataArray > None kills kernel 834368403 | |
801617689 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5049#issuecomment-801617689 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5049 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwMTYxNzY4OQ== | rbavery 22258697 | 2021-03-18T04:38:06Z | 2021-03-18T04:38:06Z | NONE | When it is opened it's a DataArray. I saved it out to a .tiff with rioxarray so it has some extra attributes but I'm not sure if those are causing this issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray.DataArray > None kills kernel 834368403 | |
521017662 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3168#issuecomment-521017662 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3168 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMTAxNzY2Mg== | rbavery 22258697 | 2019-08-13T21:33:04Z | 2019-08-13T21:34:33Z | NONE | I am not sure if this is related or not, but my dask array has a different shape before and after computing. After computing by converting to a numpy array, it looks like the time dimension (44) is still there, which is expected but I would also expect this to show in the xarray metadata. ``` result <xarray.DataArray 'reflectance' (y: 1082, x: 1084)> dask.array<shape=(1082, 1084), dtype=uint16, chunksize=(1082, 1084)> Coordinates: band int64 1 * y (y) float64 9.705e+05 9.705e+05 9.705e+05 ... 9.673e+05 9.672e+05 * x (x) float64 4.889e+05 4.889e+05 4.889e+05 ... 4.922e+05 4.922e+05 [87] the shape of the xarray and numpy array do not match after conversion to numpy array, the time dimension reappearsnp.array(result).shape (1082, 1084, 44) ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
apply_ufunc erroneously operating on an empty array when dask used 474247717 | |
520511588 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2808#issuecomment-520511588 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2808 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMDUxMTU4OA== | rbavery 22258697 | 2019-08-12T17:09:26Z | 2019-08-12T17:09:26Z | NONE | I'd be interested in contributing an example on how to apply a function to each image in a time series within a DataArray, but I can't get my function to be applied. Details are in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57419541/how-to-calculate-histogram-bins-for-each-image-in-an-xarray-dataarray-time-serie Maybe we could include apply_ufunc examples on this issue or another github issue? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improving documentation on `apply_ufunc` 420584430 | |
511135221 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3108#issuecomment-511135221 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3108 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTEzNTIyMQ== | rbavery 22258697 | 2019-07-13T16:27:06Z | 2019-07-13T16:27:06Z | NONE | Sounds good, I'll look into contributing a Landsat reader to Satpy, that's a better home for it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Landsat Surface Reflectance bands have tricky metadata 'band' attribute 467735754 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 5