home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "NONE" and user = 11671536 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

issue 3

  • inconsistent behavior in stack/unstack along one dimension 1
  • Wrong dimension referenced in boolean indexing with .loc 1
  • groupby fails on generic ndarray functions 1

user 1

  • d-chambers · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
494986964 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1431#issuecomment-494986964 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1431 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NDk4Njk2NA== d-chambers 11671536 2019-05-22T21:49:13Z 2019-05-22T21:49:13Z NONE

Yes, fixed the example. This seems to be fixed now, closing. Thanks again!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  inconsistent behavior in stack/unstack along one dimension 231838537
433117327 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2508#issuecomment-433117327 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2508 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzExNzMyNw== d-chambers 11671536 2018-10-25T16:25:39Z 2018-10-25T16:25:39Z NONE

@shoyer , Good to know. Is there a reason not to automatically wrap the ufunc with a function to return the correct type so that grouby.apply still works as expected with generic ufuncs? I haven't thought through this extensively but it seems like the behavior would be well-defined, and, at least in my case, what the user would expect to happen.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  groupby fails on generic ndarray functions 373653203
305348405 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1436#issuecomment-305348405 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1436 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwNTM0ODQwNQ== d-chambers 11671536 2017-05-31T23:39:43Z 2017-05-31T23:39:43Z NONE

I should point out It does work when I specify the dimension with a dict: python dar2 = dar.loc[{'Z': dar.Z > 1000}] assert np.all(dar2.Z > 1000) # doesn't raise

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Wrong dimension referenced in boolean indexing with .loc 232726778

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 38.701ms · About: xarray-datasette