home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 991857313 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • dimzog 3

issue 1

  • rio.crs seems to misbehave with geopandas.to_crs · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
916060645 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5782#issuecomment-916060645 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5782 IC_kwDOAMm_X842mfnl dimzog 16776790 2021-09-09T12:48:43Z 2021-09-09T12:48:43Z NONE

@dcherian adopting rioxarray breaks the code. It would be better off "fixing" crs in xarray.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  rio.crs seems to misbehave with geopandas.to_crs 991857313
916025248 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5782#issuecomment-916025248 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5782 IC_kwDOAMm_X842mW-g dimzog 16776790 2021-09-09T12:02:11Z 2021-09-09T12:32:28Z NONE

xr.open_rasterio() is being used earlier in the pipeline, i think traced back the issue in these lines of code https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/7bfee3eaa8fd731494cf6b406d6abb4bec061001/xarray/backends/rasterio_.py#L335-L342

There was a discussion in geopandas repo here https://github.com/geopandas/geopandas/issues/2104

@jhamman @dcherian

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  rio.crs seems to misbehave with geopandas.to_crs 991857313
915812698 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5782#issuecomment-915812698 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5782 IC_kwDOAMm_X842ljFa dimzog 16776790 2021-09-09T06:51:28Z 2021-09-09T06:51:28Z NONE

@jhamman I'll be posting this in geopandas repo, thank you!

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  rio.crs seems to misbehave with geopandas.to_crs 991857313

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 15.721ms · About: xarray-datasette