issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where author_association = "NONE" and issue = 91676831 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • asarray Compatibility · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 1 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
116411269 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/448#issuecomment-116411269 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/448 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDExNjQxMTI2OQ== ghost 10137 2015-06-29T03:22:52Z 2015-06-29T03:22:52Z NONE

I agree that it's the point with np.asarray, but given the implementation you'd think np.asanyarray would work. My initial takeaway (until examining the source) was that this was an ndarray with additional attributes and properties. Perhaps, I'm leaning too far towards numpy and too far away from pandas.

As background: my usage involves RF pattern data which typically involves a lot of independent variables to lug around as well as the measured data.

I'll look into your other suggestions. Thank you for your reply.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   asarray Compatibility 91676831

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);