issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where author_association = "NONE", issue = 491215043 and user = 22542812 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • DerWeh · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • Add writing complex data to docs · 2 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE · 2 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
530680614 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3297#issuecomment-530680614 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3297 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzMDY4MDYxNA== DerWeh 22542812 2019-09-12T06:11:02Z 2019-09-12T06:11:02Z NONE

Sorry for the slow response, I have little time at the moment. The option invalid_netcdf=True is not yet in the latest release, is it? I get an TypeError. I would have to use a manually installed version of xarray to use it, right?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Add writing complex data to docs 491215043
529689580 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3297#issuecomment-529689580 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3297 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTY4OTU4MA== DerWeh 22542812 2019-09-09T22:20:08Z 2019-09-09T22:20:08Z NONE

I agree that including it in NetCDF is the 'most sane' approach. I don't really know how much work it is, expanding the standard.

To be honest, I don't really care about NetCDF, for me xarray is just an incredible good way to make code more stable and readable (though it still has several usability issues). In my community everyone uses HDF5 anyway, so dropping compatibility is no big issue. I just want a way to persist data as it is and conveniently load it for plotting and post processing.

I would still encourage you to push saving of complex data. In most fields people use complex data and it is hard to convince them that they benefit from this great library, if saving simple data takes complicated keyword arguments and annoys you with warnings compared to a simple np.savez on regular ndarrays.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Add writing complex data to docs 491215043

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);